Prison Riots in Nicaragua: Negotiating Co-Governance Amid Creative Violence and Public Secrecy

Abstract

In this article, I explore how prison riots, large critical incidents of a collective order, emerge, take place, and alter governance relations in place in the Nicaraguan prison system. Drawing on ethnographic research conducted with prisoners and former prisoners of two Nicaraguan prison facilities, I provide a prisoners’ point of view on the political use of violence in prison, particularly during two large prison riots. While authorities often held that prison conditions combined with the “violent attitudes” of prisoners turned prisons into “powder kegs,” such an interpretation does not allow for an understanding of riots as embedded in prison governance structures and conveniently draws the attention away from underlying issues pertaining to the de facto sharing of power in prison in Nicaragua. I argue that by using what has been termed “creative violence,” prisoners attempt to break through the authorities’ imposed regime of public secrecy and draw attention to these issues, forcing authorities to negotiate. Yet, even if riots then function as a catalyst for changes in co-governance arrangements, they do not appear to be geared at permanently damaging or annihilating the existing arrangements but rather at pressuring the authorities hard enough to make compromises and concessions as to the distribution of power in prison.

Brazilian prisons in times of mass incarceration: Ambivalent transformations

“…Another common trend which affects levels of prisoners’ control is the frequent involvement of inmates in activities of maintenance and administrative tasks, as discussed above. This is actually a common element of prisons in Latin America (Cerbini, 2021; Peirce & Fondevila, 2020; Weegels, 2020) and other peripheral contexts (Butler, Slade & Dias, 2018; Jefferson & Martin, forthcoming), not being observed in prisons in core countries. Given this context, some scholars refer to Brazilian – and Latin American – prisons as ‘co‐governed’ (Biondi, 2017; Cipriani & Azevedo, 2020; Darke, 2018; Darke & Karam, 2016; Dias, 2011; Skarbek, 2020) prisons, where inmates rule prisons in collaboration with prison staff in an endemic way, and not extraordinarily.…”

Monodualistic and Pluralistic Punishment Politics in Criminal Code Reform: Lessons from Indonesia

“…This culture then becomes ingrained in the overall prison environment. 37 Riots are often created with the aim of reducing the "authoritarianism" of correctional officers, for example, such as more humane treatment of prisoners, more decent food, etc. 38 This motive was apparent in the riot that occurred at Idi Rayeuk Detention Center in East Aceh in March 2017.…”

Becoming fugitive: Prison breaks and the space of punishment

“…That is, those prisoners who plan and manage prison breaks tend to be those who already exercise enormous control over prison life, control based upon coordination with prison officials and networks on the outside. Such inmates are pivotal players in prison “co-governance.” This is a shifting dance and détente in which power is “… organized between two forces (powerful prisoners and authorities), who both have the means and desire to instrumentalize others …to ensure their control over each other, while they also have the possibility to disorganize the existing arrangement” (Weegels, 2020: 63). In every prison, prisoner-state official rulers impose some version of order while extracting profit from the general population by taxing prison businesses.…”