2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2004.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pristane-induced autoimmunity in germ-free mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
5
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that complete removal of microbiota does not affect disease progression in these mice. The same phenomenon was observed in the pristane-induced lupus model [9]. However, completely depleting the microbiota might have neutralized the respective effects of “good” and “bad” microbes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This suggests that complete removal of microbiota does not affect disease progression in these mice. The same phenomenon was observed in the pristane-induced lupus model [9]. However, completely depleting the microbiota might have neutralized the respective effects of “good” and “bad” microbes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…A recent report on the production of Lupus antibodies induced by pristane in germ-free mice is in line with our results, showing an increase in the total IgG2a/IgG1 ratio, 30 which is similar to the shift observed for anti-HSP65 in the susceptible LIII animals. Besides, peritoneal cells from pristane-injected animals produced more IL-6 and IL-12 (p40/p70) than PBS-treated mice 6 months after injection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The presence of more microbes appeared to be associated with enhanced hypergammaglobulinemia and autoantibody production in murine model [14]. However, germ-free mice lacking normal flora also developed hypergammaglobulinemia and autoantibodies, indicating that microbial products are not essential [20]. Furthermore, adjuvant hydrocarbon oil itself without microbial Table 1 for detail).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%