Privileging the Powerful: Religion and Constitutional Law in India

Abstract

There is vast literature on secularism in India and on the effects of Hindu nationalism on secular constitutionalism. This article takes a different tack. It focuses on cases where minority status is contested or competing rights of minorities are at stake. The article uses three exemplary recent cases to illustrate how judicial doctrines devised to reform discriminatory religious practices or to protect minority interests have, perversely, favoured certain groups at the expense of others. In each area examined, the jurisprudence privileges the more powerful of those interests: the sanctity of Muslim personal law over the rights of Muslim women; Hindu dalits over dalits that converted to other religions; and minority educational institutions over children from ‘weaker’ and ‘disadvantaged’ sections of society. The article concludes by proposing a new jurisprudence of religion and constitutional practice for India, one that takes account of these inequalities and gives meaning to the fundamental rights of the most vulnerable individuals and groups.

The Future of the SDGs: A Comparative Constitutional Rescue Plan?

“…India's Supreme Court is particularly known for often pushing the envelope in this regard. 237 Resource allocation: Constitutionalising the SDGs may require governments to allocate significant resources to achieve these goals, potentially diverting funds from other priorities. This could lead to budgetary constraints and trade-offs between different policy objectives, which could be doubling worrying in countries where environmental concerns already are often relegated to the bottom of budgetary priorities.…”

Constitutionalism, Religion, and Inequality: Perspectives from Asia

“…20 Rehan Abeyratne's contribution covers a wide historical time period and a range of constitutional cases that showcase the complexity of arguments at the intersection of rights, ethnicity, and religion in India. 21 Some emphasize the liberating potential of constitutionalism, while others offer a more skeptical view. Abeyratne's article has the difficult task of intervening in a deep body of scholarly literature that has prompted significant debate on law and religion in India.…”