2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pro-competition rules in airport privatization: International experience and the Brazilian case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were improvements in railways and airports in indicator 6 (annual increase in infrastructure dedicated to each transport mode). This result is due to recent investments in railways (Betarelli Jr. et al, 2020) and the Brazilian airport concession program (Pereira Neto et al, 2016). Consequently, the increase in indicator 9 was observed, which is cargo transport journeys by rail and waterways (ANTT, 2020; ANTAQ, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were improvements in railways and airports in indicator 6 (annual increase in infrastructure dedicated to each transport mode). This result is due to recent investments in railways (Betarelli Jr. et al, 2020) and the Brazilian airport concession program (Pereira Neto et al, 2016). Consequently, the increase in indicator 9 was observed, which is cargo transport journeys by rail and waterways (ANTT, 2020; ANTAQ, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1994, the airport's parallel runway was completed (Sydney Airport Limited, 2020d). The airport was privatized by the Australian Government in 2002 (Bowyer and Chapman, 2003;Neto et al, 2016). At the time of the present study, the airport was owned by the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) listed Sydney Airport Group (Sydney Airport Limited, 2020b).…”
Section: A Brief Overview Of Sydney Airportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To integrate tourism policies with other highlevel policies (e.g. educational, environmental, transport) (Aall, 2015;Schiefelbusch et al, 2007) To adopt key mechanisms to combat corruption: prevention, detection, investigation, correction, and monitoring (Brasil, 2016) To reduce and simplify the taxation system (Vernon et al, 2005) To implement a Tourism Satellite Account methodology (Pham et al, 2009;Jones et al, 2010) To reduce the distance between tourism academics and the private/public/NGOs stakeholders (Cai et al, 2017) including the establishment of tourism observatories in each state (Pan & Yang, 2017) To articulate governance structures and implement public policies focused on international goals for environmental conservation (IUCN, 2020) To foster social, gender, and minority group equality (Albrecht, Heyer & Stanislas, 2019) To raise competition between airports in an improved airport concession model (Pereira Neto et al, 2016) To establish a regulatory framework fostering industrial relation agreements on working conventions with cruise crew, shipowners, and cruise lines (Pereira Neto et al, 2016) To better develop the destination branding in key destinations (Ruiz-Real, Uribe-Toril & Gázquez-Abad, 2020)…”
Section: Public Policies Technical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, a lack of stability is To integrate tourism policies with other high-level policies (e.g. educational, environmental, transport) (Aall, 2015;Schiefelbusch et al, 2007) To adopt key mechanisms to combat corruption: prevention, detection, investigation, correction and monitoring (Brasil, 2016) To reduce and simplify the taxation system (Vernon et al, 2005) To articulate governance structures and implement public policies focused on international goals for environmental conservation (IUCN, 2020) To foster social, gender and minority group equality (Albrecht et al, 2019) To raise competition between airports in an improved airport concession model (Pereira Neto et al, 2016) To establish a regulatory framework fostering industrial relation agreements on working conventions with cruise crew, shipowners and cruise lines (Pereira Neto et al, 2016) To implement a Tourism Satellite Account methodology (Duc Pham et al, 2009;Jones et al, 2010) To reduce the distance between tourism academics and the private/public/NGOs stakeholders (Cai et al, 2017), including the establishment of tourism observatories in each state (Pan and Yang, 2017) To better develop the destination branding in key destinations (Ruiz-Real et al, 2020) To acquire the status of a smart destination (Femenia-Serra et al, 2019) To develop tourism promotion strategies (Pan and Yang, 2017) To follow the guidelines for sustainability in protected areas (Leung et al, 2018) To value regional products and cuisines (WTO, 2012) To develop an efficient business model in the area of events (Pan and Zhang, 2020) reflected in Brazil's inefficient conservation policies, which reduce the likelihood that the country will address its greenhouse gas emissions (Borrini-Feyerabend et al, 2013). Another unintended consequence of political instability is the continuation of social inequalities, including those impacting minorities of gender and sexual orientation and those involving barriers to social improvement.…”
Section: Brazil Tourism Agenda For 2030mentioning
confidence: 99%