2020
DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pro‐environmental millennial consumers' responses to the fur conundrum of luxury brands

Abstract: Has fur transitioned from once being a status symbol into a badge of shame in today's society? Seventy percent of designer fashion collections used animal fur in 2016 (Oaten, 2016). However, the over 40-billion-dollar global fur industry (George-Parkin, 2018) has been under tremendous scrutiny, especially over the past few years for its inhumane practices. Thus, making fur one of fashion's most controversial materials.With an increased preference towards and heightened purchase intention for eco-friendly produ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, materialism is argued to be against community and affiliation values ( Grouzet et al, 2005 ), which damages consumers’ social well-being ( Moldes & Ku, 2020 ). Additionally, luxury consumption driven by sensory satisfactions (e.g., wearing animal fur) is considered extravagant and environmental unfriendly and induces dissonance as a consequence ( Rolling, Seifert, Chattaraman, & Sadachar, 2021 ). Moreover, due to its perceived association with excessive privilege, luxury consumption itself triggers inauthentic feelings from the bottom up, which consequently leads to a lack of confidence ( Goor, Ordabayeva, Keinan, & Crener, 2020 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, materialism is argued to be against community and affiliation values ( Grouzet et al, 2005 ), which damages consumers’ social well-being ( Moldes & Ku, 2020 ). Additionally, luxury consumption driven by sensory satisfactions (e.g., wearing animal fur) is considered extravagant and environmental unfriendly and induces dissonance as a consequence ( Rolling, Seifert, Chattaraman, & Sadachar, 2021 ). Moreover, due to its perceived association with excessive privilege, luxury consumption itself triggers inauthentic feelings from the bottom up, which consequently leads to a lack of confidence ( Goor, Ordabayeva, Keinan, & Crener, 2020 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As consumers' ethical awareness of animals has increased [2,30], their public opinion on social media is also expected to be different compared to the past. As a prior study, Choi and Lee [19] used text mining and social network analysis to prove that ethical perceptions of consumers in the past and present have changed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the priority of industrial productivity over animal welfare has been criticized [1]. The over-40-billion-dollar global fur industry has been under tremendous scrutiny, especially over the past few years, for its inhumane practices [2]. The unethical issues of the fashion industry related to animal rights include the killing of foxes, minks, raccoons, or alligators, the hurting of animals for testing dyes due to the production of materials from fur and leather [3], and the pollution of ecosystems through the release of toxic chemicals during the production process [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Past studies on faux fur were conducted from various perspectives. Rolling et al [12] investigated the cognitive dissonance between the faux fur marketing of luxury brands and their new products using real fur and its impact on brand attitude and purchase intention. Lee, Karpova, and Bayter [13] studied how exposure to different types of information (one-sided information against using animal-based materials, one-sided information promoting use of animal-based materials, two-sided information presenting both sides, and information not related to fashion products made of animal-based materials) influenced college students' attitudes and subjective norms towards purchasing fashion products made of fur, leather, and wool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%