2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.11.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing polyamide membrane surface charge, zeta potential, wettability, and hydrophilicity with contact angle measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
182
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 388 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
15
182
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Charge density of the membrane was evaluated through the zeta potential value which indicates a net interaction between the membrane surface and an electrolyte (Hurwitz et al, 2010). In this study, the solution pH appeared to have a significant impact on the zeta potential of the ESPA2 membrane (Fig.…”
Section: Charge Densitymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Charge density of the membrane was evaluated through the zeta potential value which indicates a net interaction between the membrane surface and an electrolyte (Hurwitz et al, 2010). In this study, the solution pH appeared to have a significant impact on the zeta potential of the ESPA2 membrane (Fig.…”
Section: Charge Densitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Tian et al (2010) hypothesised that sodium hydroxide could increase the membrane surface hydrophobicity by reacting with hydrophilic functional groups in the active layer. Previous studies (Hurwitz et al, 2010;Tang et al, 2009) showed that changes in the contact angle may indicate changes in the membrane conformation and also the charge density. However, in this study, no observable changes in the conformation of the membranes cleaned by either citric acid or sodium hydroxide can be seen from the zeta potential (Fig.…”
Section: Hydrophobocity and Surface Bondingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This negative charge could be the result of the ionization of acidic functional groups. Double layer compression with increasing NaCl concentration was observed in both membranes [25]. In solutions of low CaCl 2 concentration, the charge of PA and PS membranes was significantly reduced by ca.…”
Section: Zeta Potential Of Ps and Pa Membranesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Nevertheless, the accurate surface chemistry of both membranes (e.g., spatial distribution and accessibility of functional groups) is not known [31], consequently, adding a level of complexity to these systems. Additionally, PA and PS membranes have been previously demonstrated chemically and physically heterogeneous even at the nano-scale [25,32]. The contact angles of PA and PS membranes were 57.8±1.9 o (n=8) and 67.2±2.9 o (n=8), respectively, indicating the higher hydrophilic character of PA membrane surface.…”
Section: Rbs Ftir Contact Angle and Elemental Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Here is the measured electrical (streaming) potential in the flow cell, ΔP is the applied pressure in the cell used to force the electrolyte to flow over the charged surfaces, ε 0 is the vacuum permittivity, εr is the relative dielectric constant of the electrolyte solvent, is the zeta potential, ηis the dynamic viscosity of the electrolyte, λ 0 is the bulk conductivity of the circulating electrolyte, λ h is the electrical conductivity of the highly saline reference solution (100mM KCl), R h is the measured electrical resistance across the flow channel filled with the highly saline reference solution, and R is the measured electrical resistance across the flow channel filled with the normal experimental electrolyte [5].…”
Section: Surface Charge Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%