Nitroxyl radicals have been widely used as a free radical probe for electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and EPR imaging (EPRI) to investigate in vivo redox conditions. [1][2][3][4][5][6] The enzymatic or chemical reduction system reduces nitroxyl radicals to the corresponding hydroxylamine, [7][8][9][10][11][12] enabling us to estimate the redox status in vivo. Hypoxic conditions in the tumor, [13][14][15] biological reducing agents, 16,17) and oxidative stresses accompanying the synthesis of superoxide and/or hydroxyl radical [18][19][20] can enhance the reduction of nitroxyl radicals in vivo. In contrast, oxidative conditions in a tissue could apparently decrease the in vivo reduction rate of nitroxyl radicals due to the re-oxidation of hydroxylamine to the original nitroxyl radical.
21)The feasibility of nitroxyl radicals as T 1 -enhancing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents has been described since the early 1980s. 22,23) Since the T 1 relaxation of protons can be affected by paramagnetic nitroxyl electron spin, changing the MRI contrast before and after administration of the nitroxyl contrast agent can reflect the amount of nitroxyl contrast agent in addition to providing simultaneous anatomical mapping, similar to Gd 3ϩ . Despite a number of pharmacokinetic studies, 7,24,25) rapid in vivo reduction of the nitroxyl contrast agent was not as useful as an MRI contrast agent in early 1980s.
26)At that time, relatively low T 1 relaxivity of nitroxyl contrast agents was another problem for obtaining clinically and/or experimentally utilizable T 1 -contrast enhancement. Recently, high-power magnet MRI instrumentation, such as 4.7 T, with a T 1 -weighted spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) pulse sequence has enabled us to take a fresh look at the feasibility of employing nitroxyl radicals as MRI contrast agents. [27][28][29] The redox status of the tumor and normal tissue can be reflected in the time course of T 1 contrast after the injection of a paramagnetic nitroxyl contrast agent to an experimental animal.Gradient echo (GE)-based T 1 -weighted contrast imaging is fast and is suitable for dynamic imaging, although T 1 -weighted MRI contrast can not be utilized to quantify the amount of contrast agent directly. The pseudo decay rate calculated based on decreasing T 1 -weighted MRI contrast can show a similar value to the decay rate obtained by EPR measurement when an identical phantom sample is measured by both methods. 27,28) In vivo experiments which compared the decay rates of a nitroxyl contrast agent between normal and tumor tissues of a mouse also showed similar results between EPRI and MRI experiments. 27,28) Several problems on EPRI, such as lack of anatomical information, low spatial resolution, low temporal resolution, and relatively small sample volume, can be solved using MRI; however, the pseudo decay rate obtained based on T 1 -weighted MRI contrast is not a theoretically true decay rate because the detection of nitroxyl radical using MRI is indirect, based on the enhancement o...