2000
DOI: 10.1071/bt97022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems of placing boundaries on ecological continua - options for a workable national rainforest definition in Australia

Abstract: Options for a new definition of, and key for, rainforest in Australia are provided. The definitions take a national perspective, and are based on the ecological characteristics of rainforest species and some structural and floristic characteristics. Rainforest plant species are defined as those adapted to regenerating under low-light conditions experienced under the closed canopy or in localised gaps caused by recurring disturbances which are part of the natural rainforest ecosystem, and are not dependent on f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), but at least it provides a yardstick – there is no other such listing available. There is a gradation from obligate rainforest species to those that occur mostly in rainforest but are present also (in less abundance) in open forest, and it is something of an artifice to cut this continuity, especially so as the very definition of rainforest may be extremely slippery (Bowman 2000, 2001; Hill 2000; Lynch & Neldner 2000; Neldner & Lynch 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), but at least it provides a yardstick – there is no other such listing available. There is a gradation from obligate rainforest species to those that occur mostly in rainforest but are present also (in less abundance) in open forest, and it is something of an artifice to cut this continuity, especially so as the very definition of rainforest may be extremely slippery (Bowman 2000, 2001; Hill 2000; Lynch & Neldner 2000; Neldner & Lynch 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). This rule‐based approach is significant, at least in the Australian context, because standardized definitions of vegetation types and particularly ‘rain forest’ are mired in controversy (Bowman, 2000; Lynch & Neldner, 2000). Furthermore, in the monsoon tropics many tree species can occur in a wide variety of vegetation types, making neat and absolute dichotomization of ‘rain forest’ and ‘non‐rain forest’ species impossible (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2005; Campbell & Clarke 2006). Rainforest plants may be defined as species not dependent on fire for successful regeneration (Lynch & Neldner 2000), although abundant recruitment of new plants via seedlings and root‐coppicing after fire has been documented (Stocker 1981; Unwin 1983; Williams 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%