IEEE InternationalElectron Devices Meeting, 2005. IEDM Technical Digest.
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2005.1609454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process integration technology and device characteristics of CMOS FinFET on bulk silicon substrate with sub-10 nm fin width and 20 nm gate length

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed device exhibits a much better short-channel behavior as compared with the standard FinFET structure, and, hence, it is better scalable for channel lengths below 20 nm. The proposed device can be fabricated by using a standard siliconon-insulator (SOI) FinFET process along with an extra antipunchthrough implant similar to the one used for a bulk FinFET [8] device. The BS FinFET can also be fabricated in a standard bulk FinFET process without an extra mask.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed device exhibits a much better short-channel behavior as compared with the standard FinFET structure, and, hence, it is better scalable for channel lengths below 20 nm. The proposed device can be fabricated by using a standard siliconon-insulator (SOI) FinFET process along with an extra antipunchthrough implant similar to the one used for a bulk FinFET [8] device. The BS FinFET can also be fabricated in a standard bulk FinFET process without an extra mask.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bulk FinFETs are found to have less defect density and process complexity along with several other advantages such as better heat dissipation capability and lower cost [7]. Bulk FinFETs can be fabricated with an extra implant to increase the doping in the inactive fin region to suppress the source-to-drain coupling through the substrate [8]. Although the FinFET devices show excellent promise, they still suffer from issues such as process complexity, additional parasitic capacitances due to the nonplanar nature of the structure, and width quantization effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, we can see that the doping profiles (ii) and (iii) give better I OFF when compared to the conventional doping profiles. Note that in both the cases, the heavier doping in the lower fin region is lower compared to what has been reported [6]. As has been shown, the conventional profiles give rise to a higher I OFF value due to the band-to-band-tunneling (BTBT) currents owing to their heavier doping concentrations.…”
Section: DC Device Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…We use the term "upper fin" to represent the fin region which is actually controlled by the gate and "lower fin" to represent the fin region which is covered by the T ins . The proposed bulk FinFET structures [6]- [8] use a heavily doped upper fin/channel doping and a heavier lower fin doping to control the short-channel effects (SCEs). This corresponds to the profile case (i) as shown in Fig.…”
Section: DC Device Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, it is important to optimize bulk FinFET performance as in SOI FinFET. The earlier bulk FinFET structures [11,12,13] use a heavily doped upper Fin/channel doping and a heavier lower fin doping to control the short-channel effects (SCEs) but this results in a channel mobility degradation causing a lower ION/IOFF ratio. Therefore different Bulk structures are studied can compared for non uniform doping profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%