2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Production networks and borderlands: Cross-border yarsagumba trade in the Kailash Landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regulation and control of mobility across borders is of course a key means of asserting state sovereignty. At the same time, borderland residents agentively use borders as resources for their livelihoods (Chan and Womack 2016;Korf and Raeymaekers 2013;Wallrapp, Faust, and Keck 2019). Tracking the relationship between mobility and sovereignty, this article examines how political-economic transformations in both China and Nepal, along with both states' attempts to control informal mobility across the border, helped maintain social sovereignty by enabling Limi residents to perpetuate a ritual economy centred on a monastic institution.…”
Section: Non-state Sovereigntymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulation and control of mobility across borders is of course a key means of asserting state sovereignty. At the same time, borderland residents agentively use borders as resources for their livelihoods (Chan and Womack 2016;Korf and Raeymaekers 2013;Wallrapp, Faust, and Keck 2019). Tracking the relationship between mobility and sovereignty, this article examines how political-economic transformations in both China and Nepal, along with both states' attempts to control informal mobility across the border, helped maintain social sovereignty by enabling Limi residents to perpetuate a ritual economy centred on a monastic institution.…”
Section: Non-state Sovereigntymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Himalayan collectors are at multiple economic disadvantages compared with collectors on the Tibetan Plateau that have long-established trade relations with mainland Chinese consumers. For example, strict state regulations for caterpillar fungus trade in India resulted in the annual transportation of $5–7.5 million worth of local products across the Nepalese border to be ‘legalized’ for export [ 13 , 21 , 22 ]. Moreover, a $10 million per annum export–import difference exists between the Chinese and Nepalese custom borders, suggesting the majority of ‘Nepalese’ caterpillar fungus does not clear local customs [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Top-down policies continue to adapt and find the best practice of sustainable caterpillar fungus harvest in each region [21,22,[24][25][26][27]. However, local stakeholder and governing regimes would benefit from asserting their ownership of locally available natural resources, often found on community lands [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirdly, the legalization process through the Nepali governmental mechanism is used for yarshagumba harvested both in India and Nepal. The publication Wallrapp et al (2019) 'Production networks and borderlands: the cross-border yarshagumba trade in the Kailash Landscape' 4 (presented in Chapter 6) analyses this part of the production network in-depth by linking the concept of global production networks by with findings from borderland studies Van Schendel and Abhraham 2005).…”
Section: Aim Of the Research Its Approach And Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wallrapp, C., Faust, H. and Keck, M. (2019): Production networks and borderlands: cross-border yarsagumba trade in the Kailash Landscape. In: Journal of Rural Studies 66: 67-76.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%