1992
DOI: 10.1162/pres.1992.1.3.295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profile Analysis of Simulator Sickness Symptoms: Application to Virtual Environment Systems

Abstract: Flight simulators are examples of virtual environment (VE) systems that often give rise to a form of discomfort resembling classical motion sickness. The major difference between simulator sickness and other forms of motion sickness is that the former exhibits more oculomotor-related symptoms and far less actual vomiting. VEs of the future are likely to include more compellingly realistic visual display systems, and these systems can also be expected to produce adverse symptoms. The implications of simulator s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
58
1
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
58
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Flashbacks, which include illusory sensations of climbing and turning, sensations of negative g, and perceived inversions of the visual field, are particularly problematic because of their sudden unexpected onset and risk to safety. (p. 62) It is important to point out that while the symptomotology of motion sickness and simulator sickness overlap, the pathognomonic signs of the former (i.e., vomiting and retching) are infrequent in the latter (Kennedy, Lane, Lilienthal, Berbaum, & Hettinger, 1992). Yet, as noted by Kennedy and his colleagues, the potential for negative aftereffects is one of the most serious problems associated with simulator sickness.…”
Section: Simulator Sicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flashbacks, which include illusory sensations of climbing and turning, sensations of negative g, and perceived inversions of the visual field, are particularly problematic because of their sudden unexpected onset and risk to safety. (p. 62) It is important to point out that while the symptomotology of motion sickness and simulator sickness overlap, the pathognomonic signs of the former (i.e., vomiting and retching) are infrequent in the latter (Kennedy, Lane, Lilienthal, Berbaum, & Hettinger, 1992). Yet, as noted by Kennedy and his colleagues, the potential for negative aftereffects is one of the most serious problems associated with simulator sickness.…”
Section: Simulator Sicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, as noted by Kennedy and his colleagues, the potential for negative aftereffects is one of the most serious problems associated with simulator sickness. Aftereffects associated with flight simulation have included disruptions of postural control (Kennedy, Fowlkes, & Lilienthal, 1993;Kennedy & Stanney, 1996), the illusions of flying and rotating, and the perceived inversion of the visual field (Kennedy et al, 1992).…”
Section: Simulator Sicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los efectos secundarios de la RV han sido observados y estudiados durante varios años en el campo de la simulación de vuelos (Kennedy et al, 1992). Por lo tanto, los cibermareos a menudo son comparados con los malestares relacionados con viajar en transportes (McCaulay y Sharkey, 1992); aunque su etiología es signifi cativamente diferente (Cobb, Nichols, Ramsey, y Wilson, 1999;Lawson et al, 2002).…”
Section: Posibles Mecanismos Que Explican Los Cibermareosunclassified
“…The questionnaire lists 4-point (0 to 3) bipolar rating scales consisting of verbal descriptors for the 16 symptoms such as general discomfort, eye strain, dizziness, and nausea. Based on data from a factor analysis of simulator sickness experiences, a procedure has been developed (Kennedy, Lane, Lilienthal, Berbaum, & Hettinger, 1992) for reducing the scores to subscales for the symptomatic components of oculomotor stress (eye strain), nausea, and disorientation, and in turn, a measure of total severity.…”
Section: Motion Sicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the task-allocated attention is rated on a 0-to-7 scale, each of the motion sickness dimensions is rated on a 0-to-3 scale. Although the model workload is summed over the three processors for a 0-to-21 scale, the total severity is a weighted sum of the 16 motion sickness dimensions resulting in a 0-to-120.54 scale (Kennedy, Lane, Lilienthal, Berbaum, & Hettinger, 1992). However, the severity distribution for the Case II treatments is heavily skewed toward lower values (skewness = 1.510, N = 16, standard error = 0.564), and weighting the scale by the ratio of the median (14.480) to the mean (22.199) results in a 0-to-78.62 scale.…”
Section: Motion Sicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%