2000
DOI: 10.1557/proc-640-h3.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Profiling of the SiO2 - SiC Interface Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Abstract: The implementation of SiC based sensors and electronics for operation in chemically harsh, high temperature environments depends on understanding the SiO 2 /SiC interface in field effect devices. We have developed a technique to fabricate wedge polished samples (angle 1 x10 -4 rad) that provides access to the SiO 2 /SiC interface via a surface sensitive probe such as xray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Lateral scanning along the wedge is equivalent to depth profiling. Spatially resolved XPS images of the O … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The salient feature for the corresponding XPS survey spectrum of the SiCl 4 ‐treated CFs is the appearance of Si 2p (103.5 eV, see the inset) and Si 2s (154.5 eV) peaks, together with a concomitant increase (decrease) in the O 1s (C 1s) peaks. While the peak at 103.5 eV represents the characteristic Si 2p signal from SiO 2 ,1719 no other Si 2p peaks associated with the silicon (99.5 eV),17 SiO (101.7 eV),17 or SiC (101 eV)18, 20 were observed. The observed C signal in the XPS survey spectrum of the SiO 2 ‐coated CFs arises from the CF substrate, indicating that the SiO 2 layer is non‐pinhole‐free and/or thinner than the XPS probe depth (<10 nm) 21.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The salient feature for the corresponding XPS survey spectrum of the SiCl 4 ‐treated CFs is the appearance of Si 2p (103.5 eV, see the inset) and Si 2s (154.5 eV) peaks, together with a concomitant increase (decrease) in the O 1s (C 1s) peaks. While the peak at 103.5 eV represents the characteristic Si 2p signal from SiO 2 ,1719 no other Si 2p peaks associated with the silicon (99.5 eV),17 SiO (101.7 eV),17 or SiC (101 eV)18, 20 were observed. The observed C signal in the XPS survey spectrum of the SiO 2 ‐coated CFs arises from the CF substrate, indicating that the SiO 2 layer is non‐pinhole‐free and/or thinner than the XPS probe depth (<10 nm) 21.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is known that the binding energy difference between the stoichiometric SiO 2 and SiC is about 3.5 eV. 12 However, in Fig. 2͑b͒, the high energy peak is gradually shifted toward the SiC substrate peak across the interfacial layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, in the same annealed sample, the Si 2p peak at 103.4 eV (Fig. 3c) corresponds to the binding energy of SiO 2 [23]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%