2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic and predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after curative rectal cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Adequately predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer represents a key factor in order to achieve a fully personalized treatment approach, especially in the case of locally advanced disease presentation, which constitute a well-established indication for radiation therapy [127]. The identification of biomarkers able to predict patients' outcomes (i.e., response to nCRT) currently represents a priority in the radiotherapy research landscape, and imaging-derived response predictors are a topic of active investigation [128][129][130][131][132][133].…”
Section: Texture Analysis In Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy-a Focus On Rectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adequately predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer represents a key factor in order to achieve a fully personalized treatment approach, especially in the case of locally advanced disease presentation, which constitute a well-established indication for radiation therapy [127]. The identification of biomarkers able to predict patients' outcomes (i.e., response to nCRT) currently represents a priority in the radiotherapy research landscape, and imaging-derived response predictors are a topic of active investigation [128][129][130][131][132][133].…”
Section: Texture Analysis In Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy-a Focus On Rectal Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Hamid et al (43) conducted a meta-analysis regarding the prognostic impact of NLR in rectal cancer patients undergoing curative resection and noted that pretreatment NLR is significantly correlated with DFS and OS. However, they analyzed mixed populations treated with surgery alone or preoperative CRT followed by surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, several studies and meta-analyses have supported the prognostic and predictive values of NLR in patients with rectal cancer with or without NACRT. A meta-analysis by Hamid et al demonstrated that high NLR was a poor prognostic factor and associated with unfavorable OS (HR = 1.92, 95% CI = 1.60–2.30, p < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.51–2.22, p < 0.001) [ 38 ]. Besides, the meta-analysis showed that low NLR was a significant predictor of pCR (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.16–2.27, p = 0.004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another study analyzing 115 patients with LARC who received NACRT, the median survival rate was significantly lower in the high-NLR (>5) group than it was in the low-NLR (≤5) group (18.8 vs. 54.4 months, p < 0.001) [ 39 ]. However, a meta-analysis of 7,553 patients (with NLR cutoff levels ranging from 1.75 to 5) with rectal cancer revealed that an NLR of ≥4 was not associated with OS or DFS [ 38 ]. Overall, most studies have focused on the impacts of the NLR on downstaging or survival in patients with LARC following NACRT, and researchers have usually demonstrated correlations between high NLR values and poor oncological outcomes [ 17 , 18 , 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%