2018
DOI: 10.1177/1352458518807101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prognostic information for people with MS: Impossible or inevitable?

Abstract: Delivering prognostic information is a challenging issue in medicine and has been largely neglected in the past. A major reason has been a suspected nocebo effect of pessimistic estimates, although this is largely unproven. Among people with multiple sclerosis (MS), there is a strong unmet need to receive long-term prognostic information. This viewpoint discusses reasons for this blind spot in physicians’ attitude, foremost among which is the uncertainty of prognostic estimates. Possible strategies to move for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Patient preferences are likely to be important in this context. While it has been suggested that delivery of prognostic information may lead to nocebo effects (Heesen et al, 2018), we found no studies in our review to support this assumption, at least in terms of QOL impacts.…”
Section: Negative Focscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Patient preferences are likely to be important in this context. While it has been suggested that delivery of prognostic information may lead to nocebo effects (Heesen et al, 2018), we found no studies in our review to support this assumption, at least in terms of QOL impacts.…”
Section: Negative Focscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a highly heterogeneous disease, with a wide spectrum of disability outcomes and immunological endophenotypes. 1 It is therefore important to identify biomarkers in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood to better predict disability outcomes, and to help select the most appropriate therapy for an individual person with MS. Reliable biomarkers would be helpful to identify those higher risk MS patients for whom highly efficacious (but higher risk) treatments might be prescribed, as well as to identify patients with low risk of disability for whom safer, but lower efficacy treatments would be sufficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Given its highly heterogeneous clinical presentations and disease course, it is critical to identify biomarkers to monitor disease progression and therapeutic efficacy. 3,4 Although brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) is routinely used to monitor disease progression, the clinical relevance of the changes in the MRI activity is uncertain. 5 As the extension of the brain, the retina of the patients with MS displays inflammatory and neurodegenerative changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%