2020
DOI: 10.1002/gdj3.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progress towards a holistic land and marine surface meteorological database and a call for additional contributions

Abstract: Historical observational climate records are crucial in understanding climatic variability, extreme past weather and climate events and allowing us to make informed decisions for better societal adaptation to climate change (e.g., Kennedy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed understanding of past weather and climate, including variability and trends, is essential to better understand and predict ongoing changes in climate and weather statistics. Historical observational datasets intended to accomplish this are spatially and temporally incomplete, and often have inhomogeneity issues (Brönnimann et al 2013;Cram et al 2015;Jones et al 1999;Parker et al 1997;Rennie et al 2014;Thorne et al 2017;Noone et al 2021). Reanalyses can provide complete and consistent atmospheric fields by objectively combining historical observations with modern numerical weather prediction model forecasts, while accounting for estimated errors in both (Kalnay et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed understanding of past weather and climate, including variability and trends, is essential to better understand and predict ongoing changes in climate and weather statistics. Historical observational datasets intended to accomplish this are spatially and temporally incomplete, and often have inhomogeneity issues (Brönnimann et al 2013;Cram et al 2015;Jones et al 1999;Parker et al 1997;Rennie et al 2014;Thorne et al 2017;Noone et al 2021). Reanalyses can provide complete and consistent atmospheric fields by objectively combining historical observations with modern numerical weather prediction model forecasts, while accounting for estimated errors in both (Kalnay et al 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted in Menne et al (in prep) , the ISD is being replaced during late 2022, with a new Global Historical Climate Network Hourly (GHCNH) dataset taking its place in the NOAA/NCEI dataset offerings. GHCNH has been co-developed with a Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) providing access to in situ observations (Thorne et al 2017, Noone et al 2021. These efforts are also including the parent datasets of the ISD, and this issue is present in these products too, until such time as the USAF has corrected the decoding of past messages.…”
Section: Correction and Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available observations to inform the estimation of global surface temperature changes are sparse and oftentimes discontinuous, with some regions consistently under‐sampled or, worse still, completely unsampled (Freeman et al, 2017; Rennie et al, 2014). Coverage of available observations has varied considerably over time with early records being much more sparse (Noone et al, 2021). They also suffer from time‐varying biases arising from changes in instrumentation, siting and observational practices which must be adjusted for prior to use in long‐term climate applications (Aguilar et al, 2003; Conrad & Pollak, 1950; Kennedy, 2014; Menne & Williams, 2009; Trewin, 2010; Venema et al, 2020).…”
Section: Datasets Of Global Surface Temperature Changementioning
confidence: 99%