2003
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive introgression between Brassica napus (oilseed rape) and B. rapa

Abstract: We have earlier shown extensive introgression between oilseed rape (Brassica napus) and B. rapa in a weedy population using AFLP markers specific for the nuclear genomes. In order to describe the progress of this introgression, we examined 117 offspring from 12 maternal plants from the introgressed population with the same AFLPmarkers; AFLP data were supported by chromosome counting. We also analysed the offspring with a speciesspecific chloroplast marker and finally evaluated the reproductive system in select… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
60
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we detected no transgene introgression into B. rapa or B. juncea in the present investigation, such introgression may occur in areas such as roadsides where plants of these species grow side by side, spontaneously or artificially, and hybridization or introgression has been reported to occur between B. napus and these species under natural conditions (Bing et al, 1996;Hansen et al, 2003;Jørgensen et al, 1996;Warwick et al, 2004). The fitness of the resulting hybrids or backcrossed plants is typically reduced in early generations; the F 1 and BC 1 generations usually exhibit reduced pollen fertility and seed production (Brown and Brown, 1996;Frello et al, 1995;Mikkelsen et al, 1996b).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Although we detected no transgene introgression into B. rapa or B. juncea in the present investigation, such introgression may occur in areas such as roadsides where plants of these species grow side by side, spontaneously or artificially, and hybridization or introgression has been reported to occur between B. napus and these species under natural conditions (Bing et al, 1996;Hansen et al, 2003;Jørgensen et al, 1996;Warwick et al, 2004). The fitness of the resulting hybrids or backcrossed plants is typically reduced in early generations; the F 1 and BC 1 generations usually exhibit reduced pollen fertility and seed production (Brown and Brown, 1996;Frello et al, 1995;Mikkelsen et al, 1996b).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…The higher photosynthetic capability suggests that F 1 hybrids may have enhanced vegetative vigor compared to their parents, and may present a larger potential for transgene spread than formerly expected. The compounded fitness estimate suggests a high seed set per F 1 plant, and spontaneous introgression of genes from B. napus × B. rapa hybrids to wild species has been reported (Hansen et al, 2001;Hansen et al, 2003). BC 1 hybrids form the next step of transgene introgression into wild species, but our results suggest that the vegetative vigor of the BC 1 plants is limited.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…In addition, B. napus can hybridize with at least eight related species, B. rapa being the most likely hybridization partner. A high degree of spontaneous hybridization between oilseed rape and the weedy and wild relative B. rapa can occur under field conditions (Jørgensen and Andersen, 1994), and there is a well documented possibility of gene exchange between these species (Hansen et al, 2001;Hansen et al, 2003). We used two transgenic B. napus lines to produce the first hybrid generation (F 1 ) and the first backcross generation (BC 1 ) with two populations of B. rapa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not surprising, as B. rapa (AA genome, 2n 020 chromosomes) is one of the progenitor species of B. napus (AACC genome, 2n 038 chromosomes). Spontaneous hybridization and introgression between weedy B. rapa and B. napus was reported in Danish studies (Jørgensen and Andersen 1994;Jørgensen et al 1996;Landbo et al 1996;Hansen et al 2001Hansen et al , 2003,United States field studies (Halfhill et al 2002, and United Kingdom studies (Wilkinson et al 2003); and between cultivated lines of B. rapa and B. napus in field experiments in Canada (Bing et al 1996b). Based on the distribution of herbarium specimens, weedy B. rapa has a limited distribution as an agricultural and/or ruderal weed in B. napus growing areas in Quebec ).…”
Section: Female Parent)male Parent Citationmentioning
confidence: 99%