2016
DOI: 10.1080/17547075.2016.1189308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Progressive Partitions: The Promises and Problems of the American Open Plan Office

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Open plan is a generic term that came into common parlance in the USA in the late 1960s and early 1970s, prefiguring the interest in flexibility and circulation associated with contemporary offices. It refers to a rough amalgamation of two office design concepts, one European and one North American (Kaufmann-Buhler, 2016). Bürolandschaft (‘office landscape’) was developed by the German Schnelle brothers in the 1950s for Quickborner in Hamburg, and arranged office furniture according to patterns of communication amongst workers, as opposed to rank (Abercrombie, 2001).…”
Section: Office Space: Understanding Technologies Through Their Workpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Open plan is a generic term that came into common parlance in the USA in the late 1960s and early 1970s, prefiguring the interest in flexibility and circulation associated with contemporary offices. It refers to a rough amalgamation of two office design concepts, one European and one North American (Kaufmann-Buhler, 2016). Bürolandschaft (‘office landscape’) was developed by the German Schnelle brothers in the 1950s for Quickborner in Hamburg, and arranged office furniture according to patterns of communication amongst workers, as opposed to rank (Abercrombie, 2001).…”
Section: Office Space: Understanding Technologies Through Their Workpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly pre-existing the emphasis on flexibility in the present-day space as service model, these design concepts combined in open plan were challenges to the office orthodoxy in two ways. First, open plan was founded on the rejection of the organizational chart as a means to order office space and instead used ‘real patterns of communication’ as the basis for arrangement, moving away from a ‘top-down bureaucracy’ towards ‘a flat or “organic” system of interdependent elements’ (Kaufmann-Buhler, 2016: 212). The promotion of such ‘spatial flexibility’ by architects of offices in the 1960s and 1970s (Martin, 2003: 93), it should be noted, also worked to the advantage of office real estate developers who were able to cheaply construct buildings as empty shells to allow their flexible furnishing by the companies leasing them (Duffy, 1997).…”
Section: Office Space: Understanding Technologies Through Their Workpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The term “office” contains the meanings of furniture and the environment that came to be known as workspace after the Second World War. In 1959, brothers Eberhard and Wolfgang Schnelle (Kaufmann-Buhler, 2016) invented in Germany the landscape office ( Burolandscap ) around a workspace without any barriers and walls that might hinder communication so as to make the environment more desirable and, therefore, improve work efficiency. By 1960, many countries were relying on this kind of offices.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bir başka deyişle çalışanlar açısından çalıştığı yerin her an değişebilme olasılığı, fiziksel ortama bağlanmayı engelleyebilmektedir. 1950'lerde sosyal, teknik ve örgütsel sorunları aşabilme, örgütlerde statü ve hiyerarşiyi azaltabilme amacıyla ortaya çıkan açık ofislerin, zamanla olumlu yanlarını yitirmeye başladığı öne sürülmektedir (Kaufmann-Buhler, 2016). Örgütlerin esneklik ve düşük maliyet nedeniyle tercih ettiği açık ofislerin, günlük çalışma yaşamında çalışanlar açısından olumsuzluklarının ağır basmaya başladığı düşünülmektedir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified