Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant‐supported prostheses

Batista, Mauro Alexandre Benites; Bonachela, Wellington Cardoso; Soares, Janir Alves

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01529.x

Cited by 36 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Clinical research has shown that the mean active tactile sensibility thresholds of subjects wearing implant-supported prostheses in both arches, or in one arch occluding with natural teeth, are similar to those observed for subjects with natural teeth (MericskeStern et al 1995;Jang & Kim 2001;Henry 2005;Batista et al 2008). The active tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants opposing a natural tooth is similar to that of pairs of natural teeth (Enkling et al 2007).…”

Section: Opposing Structures and Proprioceptionmentioning

confidence: 71%

“…The active tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants opposing a natural tooth is similar to that of pairs of natural teeth (Enkling et al 2007). This suggests that similar sensory-motor pathways guide impulses generated in the periodontal ligament and peri-implant region (Batista et al 2008) and that implants may have tactile sensibility of their own (Enkling et al 2012).…”

Section: Opposing Structures and Proprioceptionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants

Urdaneta

Leary

Panetta³

et al. 2012

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Opposing Structures and Proprioceptionmentioning

confidence: 71%

Section: Opposing Structures and Proprioceptionmentioning

confidence: 97%

The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants

Urdaneta

Leary

Panetta³

et al. 2012

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The authors suggest that sensory and motor feedback to the central nervous system can be restored by implant-supported full dentures consequently improving the quality of life of prostheses wearers [22–24]. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Sensibility Threshold for Interocclusal Thickness of Patients Wearing Complete Dentures

Shala

Dula

Pustina-Krasniqi

et al. 2017

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate sensibility threshold for interocclusal thickness in experienced and nonexperienced denture wearers after the insertion of new complete dentures. Materials and Methods A total of 88 patients with complete dentures have participated in this study. The research was divided into two experimental groups, compared with the previous experience prosthetic dental treatment. The sensibility threshold for interocclusal thickness was measured with metal foil with 8 μm thickness and width of 8 mm, placed between the upper and lower incisor region. Statistical analysis was performed using standard software package BMDP (biomedical statistical package). Results Results suggest that time of measurement affects the average values of the sensibility threshold for interocclusal thickness (F = 242.68, p = 0.0000). Gender appeared to be a significant factor when it interacted with time measurement resulting in differences in sensibility threshold for interocclusal thickness (gender: F = 9.84, p = 0.018; F = 4.83, p = 0.0003). Conclusion The sensibility threshold for interocclusal thickness was the most important functional adaptation in patient with complete dentures. A unique trait of this indicator is the progressive reduction of initial values and a tendency to reestablish the stationary state in the fifteenth week after dentures is taken off.

show abstract

“…However, patients with osseointegrated implants supported prosthesis displayed impairment of fine motor control of the mandible because of loss of afferent impulse from mechanoreceptors present in the PDL. Surprisingly, mechanical stimulus of osseointegrated implants in the jaw bone still elicits response [95,[97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104]. Amputation of tooth along with intra-dental and periodontal mechanoreceptors changes the sensory-motor coordination and results in faulty occlusal forces in masticatory system.…”

Section: Osseoperception and Dental Implantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution of root form endosseous dental implant-Transformation from bone anchored to ligament anchored implants and its neurological aspects-Sensory dental implants

Das¹,

Soni²,

Bellare³

2017

Med Devices Diagn Eng

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review paper investigates the possible transformation of endosseous dental implant, primarily from the current osseointegrated to the future ligament anchored implant within which a new class of implants with enhanced feature of "neuro-ligament integration" may appear. Endosseous dental implants used presently to replace missing teeth get fused with bone but they do not have any periodontal ligament interface between the alveolar socket and the surface of the implant, which natural teeth do. Hence, they lack any proprioceptive sensation, which is important for discrimination, directional and masticatory sensation. Attempts have been made to regenerate periodontium around the implant in 90s, which was not completely successful. Thereafter, there has been limited research. However, recent advances in tissue engineering and biomaterials gave renewed hope of establishing sensory dental implants. In this review, various methods of regeneration of periodontium onto the surface of titanium implants have been discussed along with the possible types of neurological assessment and neuroimaging that could be carried out for validation of its afferent feedback. The review starts by giving background information of major stages and terminologies in the field of oral implants, its response to host tissue in bone, various surface modification of dental implants, stem cells that are used for periodontal regeneration, different approaches for regeneration of periodontium, concept of proprioception in periodontium, osseoperception of dental implants and concludes with neurophysiology of oro-dentofacial region in brain including its detection and measurements methods.

show abstract

Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant‐supported prostheses

Abstract: Progressive recovery of osseoperception as a function of the combination of implant-supported prostheses could be observed. Moreover, ISO and/or ISFP combinations may similarly maximize the recovery of osseoperception.

Cited by 36 publications

References 16 publications

The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants

The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single‐tooth implants

Evaluation of Sensibility Threshold for Interocclusal Thickness of Patients Wearing Complete Dentures

Evolution of root form endosseous dental implant-Transformation from bone anchored to ligament anchored implants and its neurological aspects-Sensory dental implants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About