2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proliferation of chondrocytes on porous poly(dl-lactide)/chitosan scaffolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Solvent casting/salt leaching [13], freeze-drying [14,15] and gas foaming [16] have been used to generate porosity in chitosan and composite mixtures of chitosan and other polymers. The disadvantages of these techniques include the use of toxic solvents, the removal of solvent by evaporation (which takes days or even weeks), labour-intensive processing, irregularly shaped pores, insufficient interconnectivity and the inability to culture cells throughout the hydrogel scaffold [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solvent casting/salt leaching [13], freeze-drying [14,15] and gas foaming [16] have been used to generate porosity in chitosan and composite mixtures of chitosan and other polymers. The disadvantages of these techniques include the use of toxic solvents, the removal of solvent by evaporation (which takes days or even weeks), labour-intensive processing, irregularly shaped pores, insufficient interconnectivity and the inability to culture cells throughout the hydrogel scaffold [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in the experimental days resulted in the subsequent increase in the cell proliferation. [45,46] The extent of increase in the cell proliferation was highest in F3 and lowest in F1. Interestingly, at longer time durations, the cell proliferation in F3 and F4 was found to be similar ( Figure 5(b)).…”
Section: Proliferation Assaymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In general, two approaches to the formation of TEHV can be distinguished by the nature of the scaffolding material: (1) bioresorbable polymer scaffold, and (2) decellularized valve scaffold [1] . Although elaborate manufacturing techniques using stereolithographic anatomical models have been used for polymeric heart valve scaffolds, this approach so far could not reproduce the functional complex 3-dimensional composite heart valve architecture and has limitations in cellular adhesion [2,3] . The use of a decellularized valve scaffold offers the advantages of its innate anatomical architecture and remains the active sites for cell adhesion and growth factors, but its mechanical strength is decreased [4][5][6][7] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%