2010
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbq050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prompts to Encourage Appointment Attendance for People With Serious Mental Illness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Less intensive strategies include delivering automated prompts and appointment reminders via telephone, text, or postal mail. In Reda and colleagues' (10,11) review of the use of appointment reminders among patients with serious mental illness, the authors concluded that using a simple prompt to attend a clinic visit is associated with increased attendance rates and offers a cost-effective and practical method of encouraging treatment engagement. Furthermore, the authors demonstrated that an orientation letter delivered within a few days prior to the scheduled appointment may be more effective than a telephone prompt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less intensive strategies include delivering automated prompts and appointment reminders via telephone, text, or postal mail. In Reda and colleagues' (10,11) review of the use of appointment reminders among patients with serious mental illness, the authors concluded that using a simple prompt to attend a clinic visit is associated with increased attendance rates and offers a cost-effective and practical method of encouraging treatment engagement. Furthermore, the authors demonstrated that an orientation letter delivered within a few days prior to the scheduled appointment may be more effective than a telephone prompt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As contributors to clinical research across various settings and populations, we are confident that these efforts are seen as critical to the success of such studies, yet we know of no standard reporting requirements in the primary trials literature. In the absence of empirical data, the value of these interventions remains largely unknown; notably, research on the impact of reminder calls and texts has yielded mixed findings (Rowett, Reda, & Makhoul, 2010; Sims et al, 2012), challenging assumptions of beneficial effects. There is clearly a need to better understand these factors, a feat that cannot be accomplished until such information is consistently reported alongside other study characteristics in a standardized fashion.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While very few researchers consider the prediction of cancellation [10], numerous studies focus on no-show [18][19][20][21][22]. The probability of no-show in the literature fluctuates considerably for different diagnoses and demographics, stretching from almost zero up to 64 % [3,[23][24][25].…”
Section: Relevant Background and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%