2014
DOI: 10.4171/jems/465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propagation of chaos for the 2D viscous vortex model

Abstract: We consider a stochastic system of N particles, usually called vortices in that setting, approximating the 2D Navier-Stokes equation written in vorticity. Assuming that the initial distribution of the position and circulation of the vortices has finite (partial) entropy and a finite moment of positive order, we show that the empirical measure of the particle system converges in law to the unique (under suitable a priori estimates) solution of the 2D Navier-Stokes equation. We actually prove a slightly stronger… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
155
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
155
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the same methods for a subcritical Keller-Segel equation. The proofs are thus sometimes very similar to those in [8] but there are some differences due to the facts that (i) there are no circulation parameter (M N i in [8]): this simplify the situation since we thus deal with solutions which are probabilities, (ii) α = 1 so when we use Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev's inequality an extra change of variables for the time variable is needed (see Step 1 in the proof of Theorem 1.5 in Section 6) and (iii) the kernel is not the same: it is not divergence-free and we thus have to deal with some additional terms in our computations (see the comments before Proposition 3.1 and in the proof of Theorem 1.5). We can also notice that due to this fact, we have no already known result for the existence and uniqueness of the particle system that we consider.…”
Section: Commentssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We use the same methods for a subcritical Keller-Segel equation. The proofs are thus sometimes very similar to those in [8] but there are some differences due to the facts that (i) there are no circulation parameter (M N i in [8]): this simplify the situation since we thus deal with solutions which are probabilities, (ii) α = 1 so when we use Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev's inequality an extra change of variables for the time variable is needed (see Step 1 in the proof of Theorem 1.5 in Section 6) and (iii) the kernel is not the same: it is not divergence-free and we thus have to deal with some additional terms in our computations (see the comments before Proposition 3.1 and in the proof of Theorem 1.5). We can also notice that due to this fact, we have no already known result for the existence and uniqueness of the particle system that we consider.…”
Section: Commentssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This paper is some kind of adaptation of the work of Fournier, Hauray and Mischler in [8] where they show the propagation of chaos of some particle system for the 2D viscous vortex model. We use the same methods for a subcritical Keller-Segel equation.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He also studied the propagation of chaos for the Navier-Stokes equation with the random vortex method without regularized parameters. In a recent important work of Fournier et al [4], the authors significantly improved Osada's result: (i) They proved the propagation of chaos for the 2D viscous vortex model with any positive viscosity coefficient; (ii) the convergence holds in a strong sense, called entropic.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Our proof follows a strategy introduced in [23] for the 2D viscous vortex model. It is based on a DiPerna-Lions renormalization trick (see [21]) which makes possible to get the optimal regularity of solutions for small time and then to follow the uniqueness argument introduced by Ben-Artzi for the 2D viscous vortex model (see [4,10]).…”
Section: 7)mentioning
confidence: 99%