2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00205-015-0951-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniqueness and Long Time Asymptotic for the Keller–Segel Equation: The Parabolic–Elliptic Case

Abstract: Abstract. The present paper deals with the parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel equation in the plane in the general framework of weak (or "free energy") solutions associated to initial datum with finite mass M , finite second moment and finite entropy. The aim of the paper is threefold:(1) We prove the uniqueness of the "free energy" solution on the maximal interval of existence [0, T * ) with T * = ∞ in the case when M ≤ 8π and T * < ∞ in the case when M > 8π. The proof uses a DiPerna-Lions renormalizing argument… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recall that ρ dx ∈ C([0, T ]; C b (R 3 ) ′ ), we have ρ ε ∈ C([0, T ]; L 1 (R 3 )). Using basically the same argument as in Step 1 of the proof of Lemma 2.5 in [43], we obtain that ρ ε is a Cauchy sequence in L 1 (δ, T ; L 1 loc ) as ε → 0. In fact, for convex function β ∈ C 1 (R 3 ), we have the following chain rule: ∂ t β(ρ ε ) = ∇β(ρ ε ) · ∇h + β ′ (ρ ε )r ε + ∆β(ρ ε ) − β ′′ (ρ ε )|∇ρ ε | 2 .…”
Section: (B4)mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recall that ρ dx ∈ C([0, T ]; C b (R 3 ) ′ ), we have ρ ε ∈ C([0, T ]; L 1 (R 3 )). Using basically the same argument as in Step 1 of the proof of Lemma 2.5 in [43], we obtain that ρ ε is a Cauchy sequence in L 1 (δ, T ; L 1 loc ) as ε → 0. In fact, for convex function β ∈ C 1 (R 3 ), we have the following chain rule: ∂ t β(ρ ε ) = ∇β(ρ ε ) · ∇h + β ′ (ρ ε )r ε + ∆β(ρ ε ) − β ′′ (ρ ε )|∇ρ ε | 2 .…”
Section: (B4)mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Next, following the proof of Lemma 2.5 in [43], taking some non-negative test function χ ∈ C ∞ c (R 3 ) and integrate (B.6) over [δ 1 , t 1 ] where δ ≤ δ 1 ≤ t 1 , we find…”
Section: (B4)mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The uniqueness of weak solutions to the KS model has been concerned by many scholars. The optimal transport method [16] and the renormalizing argument [18] have been used to prove the uniqueness of weak solutions to the classical KS model with normal Laplacian term. Here we will follow the method in [31] to prove the uniqueness for the generalized KS model (1).…”
Section: Existence Uniqueness and Stability With Initial Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is sufficient to enjoy the Log-Lipschitz regularity of the nonlinear drift K * ρ, as in this case K is the Newtonian kernel (see for instance [29]). It is possible to relax this assumption to L ln L initial data [16] or even measure initial data [1]. Large time behavior is also studied in [8,10,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to relax this assumption to L ln L initial data [16] or even measure initial data [1]. Large time behavior is also studied in [8,10,16]. In higher dimension, the variant case α = 2, a = d = 3 is studied in [15], where a finite time blow-up is obtained under a concentration of initial mass condition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%