2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Propane selective carbon adsorbents from phenolic resin precursor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phenolic resin micro‐sized particles were carbonized for the selective adsorption of propane over propylene. [ 97 ] In this process, resins were first treated with phosphoric acid for hydrolysis. Then, it was carbonized under an N 2 atmosphere up to 1350°C in an alumina tubular furnace.…”
Section: Synthesis Methods Of Porous Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenolic resin micro‐sized particles were carbonized for the selective adsorption of propane over propylene. [ 97 ] In this process, resins were first treated with phosphoric acid for hydrolysis. Then, it was carbonized under an N 2 atmosphere up to 1350°C in an alumina tubular furnace.…”
Section: Synthesis Methods Of Porous Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purification of feeds containing low concentration C 3 H 8 , porous carbon with an affinity for C 3 H 8 will be an ideal adsorbent, which can directly obtain high-purity C 3 H 6 . For instance, Mendes and co-workers constructed novel carbonaceous adsorbents for C 3 H 8 /C 3 H 6 separation, which had an excellent affinity for C 3 H 8 over C 3 H 6 [102]. The carbonaceous adsorbents were synthesized by using phosphoric acid-treated phenolic resin as a precursor.…”
Section: Ch 4 /Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, we then compared the adsorption capacity on CNP-3 with other reported porous materials. The C 3 H 6 /C 3 H 8 uptake ratio was calculated to be 1.63 (Figure d), which is superior to those of commercial activated carbon materials BAX-AC (1.11, 273 K) and LAC-AC (1.14, 273 K), porous carbon ANPCs (0.98, 298 K), NACs (1.1, 298 K), and carbon molecular sieve, MFF-7 (0.93, 298 K) . Remarkably, CNP-3 showed a high C 3 H 6 uptake (3.03 mmol g –1 ) at 298 K and 1 bar, which is superior to those of reported state-of-the-art porous solid adsorbents such as SC-K (2.2 mmol g –1 ), SCMS (2.54 mmol g –1 ), and Cu(0.4)@MIL-100­(Fe) (2.8 mmol g –1 ), and even comparable to that of carbon molecular sieve MFF-8/1300 (3.3 mmol g –1 ) tested under similar conditions (Table S2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The C 3 H 6 / C 3 H 8 uptake ratio was calculated to be 1.63 (Figure 3d), which is superior to those of commercial activated carbon materials BAX-AC (1.11, 273 K) and LAC-AC (1.14, 273 K), 37 porous carbon ANPCs (0.98, 298 K), 42 NACs (1.1, 298 K), 43 and carbon molecular sieve, MFF-7 (0.93, 298 K). 44 Remarkably, CNP-3 showed a high C 3 H 6 uptake (3.03 mmol g −1 ) at 298 K and 1 bar, which is superior to those of reported state-of-theart porous solid adsorbents such as SC-K (2.2 mmol g −1 ), 45 SCMS (2.54 mmol g −1 ), 21 and Cu(0.4)@MIL-100(Fe) (2.8 mmol g −1 ), 46 and even comparable to that of carbon molecular 19,23,25,27,31,34,36,37,40,44−46,48 (e) The correlation between the ultramicropore ratio and the calculated D/r 2 of C 3 H 6 and C 3 H 8 . (f) The relationship between the ultramicropore ratio and the calculated selectivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation