2019
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stz447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of meteors with double-peaked light curves

Abstract: Twenty-one meteors showing double peaked light curves were analysed with observations collected with the Canadian Automated Meteor Observatory tracking system. Each event has orbital information, photometry, and at least one high-resolution observation. Two distinct light curve shapes were found: sudden double peaked curves, and smooth double peaked curves. The sudden peaked curves were produced by objects on asteroidal orbits and mostly showed noticeable fragmentation, while the smooth peaked curves were prod… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this point, the measurements from the wide-field camera show that the bulk of the meteoroid started to rapidly decelerate, as shown in Figure 17 (around 2.5 seconds), and that this disintegration produced a second peak in the light curve. Meteors with double peaked light curves were investigated by Roberts et al (2014) and Subasinghe and Campbell-Brown (2019). However, the observed behaviour of this event does not match any of their proposed meteoroid ablation or fragmentation mechanisms.…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At this point, the measurements from the wide-field camera show that the bulk of the meteoroid started to rapidly decelerate, as shown in Figure 17 (around 2.5 seconds), and that this disintegration produced a second peak in the light curve. Meteors with double peaked light curves were investigated by Roberts et al (2014) and Subasinghe and Campbell-Brown (2019). However, the observed behaviour of this event does not match any of their proposed meteoroid ablation or fragmentation mechanisms.…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An early study by Subasinghe et al (2016) showed that 90% of the mm-sized meteors observed by CAMO display observable fragmentation while Campbell-Brown (2017) recognized that light curves of meteors with short or invisible wakes (resembling single-body meteors) cannot be explained without including continuous fragmentation in their ablation model. In an effort to explain meteors with double-peaked light curves, Subasinghe and Campbell-Brown (2019) found that even allowing for large compositional differences within meteoroids to produce multiple peaks, fragmentation still had to be included to explain the observed span of ablation heights. These conclusions from direct observations are in accordance with classical works (e.g.…”
Section: Previous Research Done Using Camo Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation