2007
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2007.1145.1151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Properties of Particleboard Made from Pretreated Particles of Rubberwood, EFB and Rubberwood-EFB Blend

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have been initiated to make better use of EFB as a natural resource, with some using it as a substrate for mushroom cultivation 41 – 44 . In some studies, particleboards were made from EFB using UF adhesives as the binder 45 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have been initiated to make better use of EFB as a natural resource, with some using it as a substrate for mushroom cultivation 41 – 44 . In some studies, particleboards were made from EFB using UF adhesives as the binder 45 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These solutions are usually associated with more efficient use of available raw materials, for example, by production of materials of reduced density, use of recycled materials or of lower quality (Han et al 2006;Hermawan et al 2007;Mirski and Dziurka 2011), or by using other wood species that are currently not used to produce these materials. The replacement of the main raw material with alternate solutions can be described by three fundamental directions: introduction into production species not classified as forest-forming, but common in a given area (Shupe et al 2001;Zaidon et al 2007;Cheng et al 2012), introduction into production of fast-growing tree species and establishing their plantations (Arruda et al 2011;de Araújo et al 2011;Rafighi and Tabarsa 2011;Khanjanzadeh et al 2012;de Almeida et al 2017), introduction into production of species other than trees (Boquillon et al 2004;Guler and Ozen 2004;Li et al 2010;Azizi et al 2011;Li et al 2011;Park et al 2012;Bekhta et al 2013;Dziurka and Mirski 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good bonding would result in the board with low thickness swelling and vice versa (Izani et al 2012). While the low IB values indicates that the particles were not bonded strongly together, therefore, high volume of water were easily penetrated into spaces between particles of the porous structure (Zaidon et al 2007). Both AC4 and PG4 obtained the highest IB strength and lowest thickness swelling value in this study (refer to Figs.…”
Section: Effect Of the Additional Additive To The Physical Properties Of Particleboardmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The abundant availability of OPEFB has gained continuous interest among researchers and is potentially considered as the main candidate to substitute woody materials due to the shortage of resources. However, until today OPEFB is hardly accepted by particleboard manufacturers due to the hygroscopic characteristics of the OPEFB fibre itself (Ismail et al 2012).Without any treatment, particleboard made from OPEFB is unable to achieve the JIS A 5908 standard on the physical and mechanical properties of particleboard, including tensile strength, internal bonding, water absorption, thickness swelling, and density (Zaidon et al 2007). It is impossible to develop a market for OPEFB particleboard without overcoming these restrictive parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%