2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11525-014-9247-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Property nouns with -ité and -itude: formal alternation and morphopragmatics or the sad-itude of the Aité N

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we may ask them to distinguish the following four types of nouns in -ité (Koehl, 2012;Koehl & Lignon, 2014) The proposed exercise consists of determining the type of -ité derivatives of a list of nouns as in ( 9), explaining the differences between the four types and establishing the lexeme formation rules used to build them, where appropriate. The analysis of (9) includes the following points:…”
Section: Group Lexemes From a List Into Subclassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, we may ask them to distinguish the following four types of nouns in -ité (Koehl, 2012;Koehl & Lignon, 2014) The proposed exercise consists of determining the type of -ité derivatives of a list of nouns as in ( 9), explaining the differences between the four types and establishing the lexeme formation rules used to build them, where appropriate. The analysis of (9) includes the following points:…”
Section: Group Lexemes From a List Into Subclassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les études sur le français portent principalement sur la suffixation, et la perspective adoptée est le plus souvent synchronique (cf. Ferret et al, 2010 ;Martin, 2010 ;Koehl & Lignon, 2014 ;Fradin, 2016 ;Dal et al, 2018 ;Bonami & Thuilier, 2019 ;Missud & Villoing, 2020 ;Huyghe & Wauquier, 2021 ;inter alia). Un des principaux objectifs de ces études est de mettre en évidence les propriétés distinctives des affixes concurrents, mais l'hypothèse de la surabondance affixale est dans certains cas examinée.…”
Section: Lexicalisationunclassified
“…As a result, it covers a significant part of the French lexicon while describing an important number of remarkable morphological processes such as conversion and paradigmatic phenomena (e.g., parasynthetic constructions) that resist the canonical binary and oriented description between a derived word and its base. It includes both central derivational word formations (WF), such as suffixation in -age used to form action nouns (nettoyage.Nm 'cleaning'), or suffixation in -eur used to form agent nouns (contrôleur.Nm 'inspector'), and more marked and less often described formations, such as suffixation in -at (matriarcat.Nm 'matriarchy'), discussed in Roché and Plénat (2012) among others, or in -itude (exactitude.Nf 'accuracy'), see Koehl and Lignon (2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%