2019
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prophage Hunter: an integrative hunting tool for active prophages

Abstract: Identifying active prophages is critical for studying coevolution of phage and bacteria, investigating phage physiology and biochemistry, and engineering designer phages for diverse applications. We present Prophage Hunter, a tool aimed at hunting for active prophages from whole genome assembly of bacteria. Combining sequence similarity-based matching and genetic features-based machine learning classification, we developed a novel scoring system that exhibits higher accuracy than current tools in predicting ac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
162
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasmids were detected using PlasmidFinder 2.0 [16] and by BLAST searches against a local version of the Enterobacteriaceae plasmid database [47]. Prophages were annotated using the recent tool Prophage Hunter [48], which is also able to differentiate active from inactive prophages. Only active prophages were selected into the final annotation.…”
Section: Genome Sequencing and Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasmids were detected using PlasmidFinder 2.0 [16] and by BLAST searches against a local version of the Enterobacteriaceae plasmid database [47]. Prophages were annotated using the recent tool Prophage Hunter [48], which is also able to differentiate active from inactive prophages. Only active prophages were selected into the final annotation.…”
Section: Genome Sequencing and Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…286Assessment of prevalence of the RcGTA-like clusters among putative prophages 287Putative prophages in the 1,423 alphaproteobacterial genomes were predicted using the 288 PHASTER web server(Arndt et al [2016]; accessed in January, 2019). The PHASTER program was 289 chosen due to its solid performance in benchmarking studies(Sousa et al 2018) and its useful scoring 290 system that ranks predictions based on a prophage region completeness(Song et al 2019). To restrict our 291 evaluation to likely functional prophages, only predicted prophages with the PHASTER score >90 (i.e., 292 classified as "intact" prophages) were retained for further analyses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tool used to identify prophages in A. baumannii genomes was Prophage Hunter (Song et al 2019; available at https://pro-hunter.bgi.com/). Here, we obtained data on the start, end, length, score, category, and the name of the closest phage.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%