1988
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-38-1-128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proposal for Reclassification of Bacteroides asaccharolyticus, Bacteroides gingivalis, and Bacteroides endodontalis in a New Genus, Porphyromonas

Abstract: The asaccharolytic, pigmented Bacteroides, Bacteroides asaccharolyticus, Bacteroides gingivalis, and Bacteroides endodontalis, form a group of relatively homogeneous species which differ markedly in biochemical and chemical properties from the type species of Bacteroides, Bacteroides fragilis (Castellani and Chalmers), such that they should not be retained within this genus. Therefore, we propose that Bacteroides asaccharolyticus (Holdeman and Moore) Finegold and Barnes, Bacteroides gingivalis Coykendhll, Kacz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
153
2
11

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 333 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
12
153
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1989 to 1990, the species within Bacteroides were restricted to members of the B. fragilis group (241), and most of the clinically relevant species that were not retained in the genus Bacteroides were placed in the genus Porphyromonas (242) or Prevotella (240). Bacteroides gracilis, which is often involved in deep-seated infections (126), was moved to the genus Campylobacter and renamed Campylobacter gracilis (286).…”
Section: The Nitty-gritty Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1989 to 1990, the species within Bacteroides were restricted to members of the B. fragilis group (241), and most of the clinically relevant species that were not retained in the genus Bacteroides were placed in the genus Porphyromonas (242) or Prevotella (240). Bacteroides gracilis, which is often involved in deep-seated infections (126), was moved to the genus Campylobacter and renamed Campylobacter gracilis (286).…”
Section: The Nitty-gritty Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CytophagaFlavobacterium-Bacteroides (CFB) group currently represents one of eleven phyla of bacteria (Olsen & Woese, 1993 ;Woese, 1987). Phylogenetic studies that have used 16s rRNA sequences, chemotaxonomic studies and other phenotype analyses have resulted in several taxa of the CFB complex being rearranged (Bernardet et al, 1996;Nakagawa & Yamasato, 1996;Nakagawa et al, 1997;Segers et al, 1993;Shah & Collins, 1988;Steyn et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latest edition of Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, this phylum is referred as the phylum 'Bacteroidetes', and is divided into three classes, the 'Bacteroidetes', the 'Flavobacteria' and the 'Sphingobacteria' (Garrity & Holt, 2001). The genus Bacteroides and phylogenetically closely related members of genera Porphyromonas, Dysgonomonas and Tannerella are strictly anaerobic, Gram-negative, chemoheterotrophic bacteria that have been predominantly isolated from oral cavities, the gastrointestinal tract and rumen of warm-blooded animals and other body cavities of humans and animals (Shah & Collins, 1988Hofstad et al, 2000;Sakamoto et al, 2002). We isolated a mesophilic fermentative sulfur-reducing bacterium affiliated to the phylum 'Bacteroidetes' from a biodegraded oil reservoir in Canada.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%