Proposal for Standardized Tabular Reporting of Observational Surgical Studies Illustrated in a Study on Primary Repair of Bile Duct Injuries

Cho, Jai Young; Jaeger, Allison R.; Sanford, Dominic E.; Fields, Ryan C.; Strasberg, Steven M.

doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.06.004

Cited by 23 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This study was largely presented in tabular form and variables were derived from existing well defined systems such as NSQIP and NCCN. It is hoped that a standard method for reporting observational surgical trials can be developed using this approach, as we have recently described and which we refer to as Standardized Tabular Reporting (STR) . Standard tables based on rigorous systems will improve the ability to test the degree to which clinical heterogeneity exists among studies that are reported in this way.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients

Grossman

Fields

Hawkins

et al. 2016

J Hepato Biliary Pancreat

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients

Grossman

Fields

Hawkins

et al. 2016

J Hepato Biliary Pancreat

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A proposal for an ideal study follows. In addition to the items in the following list it would be very helpful to create and publish a database using the standardized tabular reporting approach [22,23] prior to initiating the studies so that all reporting centers included the same data.…”

Section: Toward a Definitive Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Preoperative predictors of conversion as indicators of local inflammation in acute cholecystitis: strategies for future studies to develop quantitative predictors

Panni

Strasberg

2017

J Hepato Biliary Pancreat

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Observational studies have identified risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability of these predictors and to identify sources of heterogeneity in the studies. Methods OVID was searched for papers published from 1995 to 2016. Studies with more than 100 patients were included. Risk factors for conversion were abstracted and categorized by statistical significance. Results Eleven studies were evaluated. Inflammation with difficulty in anatomic identification was the most common reason of conversion. Because of heterogeneity among studies a quantitative approach was not possible. Therefore, qualitative analysis using a heat map was performed along with investigation into sources of heterogeneity with the aim of creating a framework for future quantitative studies. Age, maleness, and white blood cell count were most commonly identified predictors of conversion. Sources of heterogeneity were criteria for diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, selection of patients for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, selection of variables and variations in their thresholds. Conclusions In acute cholecystitis, inflammation is the most common reason for conversion. Age, maleness and white blood cell count are common predictors of conversion. Large scale prospective studies with minimal heterogeneity are needed to establish validity of these and other predictors.

show abstract

“…The reader is referred to a recent paper on Standardized Tabular Reporting of biliary injuries which deals with reporting of complications using MAGS (Modified Accordion Grading System) and other aspects of reporting of biliary injuries. 6…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The curve is derived from recently published data from Washington University in St Louis. 6 3) B, C and D results and secondary patency rates (Grade B-D outcomes)…”

Section: ) Actuarial Primary Patency Rate (Grade a Outcome)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Proposed standards for reporting outcomes of treating biliary injuries

Cho

Baron

Carr‐Locke

et al. 2018

HPB

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Proposal for Standardized Tabular Reporting of Observational Surgical Studies Illustrated in a Study on Primary Repair of Bile Duct Injuries

Cited by 23 publications

References 29 publications

Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients

Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients

Preoperative predictors of conversion as indicators of local inflammation in acute cholecystitis: strategies for future studies to develop quantitative predictors

Proposed standards for reporting outcomes of treating biliary injuries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About