2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protean and boundaryless careers: A study on potential motivators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
87
2
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
7
87
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…From them we have identified the following models, Traditional Model (e.g., Pierre, 1979); Boundaryless Career Model (e.g., Arthur & Rousseau, 1996);Protean Career Model (e.g., Hall, 1976); Kaleidoscope Career Model (e.g., Mainiero &Sullivan, 2005); Development of Professional Career Model (e.g., Selva, 2013); Holistic Transitions Model (e.g., Wylleman &Lavalle, 2003); and Water-polo Sportive Career Model (e.g., Pallarés, Torregrossa, Azócar, Selva &Ramis, 2011). Additionally, we identified that, in one hand, the manuscripts from Briscoe & Hall (2006) and Segers, Inceoglu, Vloeberghs, Bartram &Henderickx (2008), present a combination of two of the models (Boundaryless Career Model and Protean Career Model) and, on the other hand, some of the manuscripts do not specifically present any model but they outline new proposals of conceptual and methodological archetypes of model, for that reason, we considered appropriated to include the category Prototype Model. Finally, we added a category for the manuscripts that did not present any implicit nor explicitmodel.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From them we have identified the following models, Traditional Model (e.g., Pierre, 1979); Boundaryless Career Model (e.g., Arthur & Rousseau, 1996);Protean Career Model (e.g., Hall, 1976); Kaleidoscope Career Model (e.g., Mainiero &Sullivan, 2005); Development of Professional Career Model (e.g., Selva, 2013); Holistic Transitions Model (e.g., Wylleman &Lavalle, 2003); and Water-polo Sportive Career Model (e.g., Pallarés, Torregrossa, Azócar, Selva &Ramis, 2011). Additionally, we identified that, in one hand, the manuscripts from Briscoe & Hall (2006) and Segers, Inceoglu, Vloeberghs, Bartram &Henderickx (2008), present a combination of two of the models (Boundaryless Career Model and Protean Career Model) and, on the other hand, some of the manuscripts do not specifically present any model but they outline new proposals of conceptual and methodological archetypes of model, for that reason, we considered appropriated to include the category Prototype Model. Finally, we added a category for the manuscripts that did not present any implicit nor explicitmodel.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em paralelo, Segers, et al (2008) concluíram que se tratando da carreira proteana as mulheres tem escores mais altos de motivação orientados para os valores do que os homens, porém não existe diferença de gênero quando a variável relacionada é o auto direcionamento. Quando o modelo de carreira avaliado é o sem fronteira, Segers, et al (2008) confirmam que as mulheres são mais determinadas pela mobilidade psicológica enquanto os homens pela mobilidade física.…”
Section: Gênero E Carreiraunclassified
“…Quando o modelo de carreira avaliado é o sem fronteira, Segers, et al (2008) confirmam que as mulheres são mais determinadas pela mobilidade psicológica enquanto os homens pela mobilidade física.…”
Section: Gênero E Carreiraunclassified
“…To evaluate the contribution of the respondents' framework in a generational group for Business Administration literature, it is important to stress that different authors (Segers, Inceoglu, Vloeberghs, Bartram, & Henderickx, 2008;Veloso et al, 2011) have already identified that different groups of employees perceive certain aspects of organizational life in different ways, and that they are impacted in different levels by organizational efforts to manage their careers. Therefore, understanding the professional choices demonstrated by the anchors in their relationship with this generation's values can produce conceptual reflections not only concerning Generation Y, but also with regard to the theories that involve people management.…”
Section: Implications On the Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%