Protection of plants from herbicides with 1,8-naphthalic anhydride as illustrated with sorghum

Jordan, L. S.; Jolliffe, Virgil A.

doi:10.1007/bf01684362

Cited by 18 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Interaction contrast UNTRT vs. HERB X NA vs. Others (P = .046) demonstrated that response of big bluestem to NA (compared to other safeners) depended on presence of herbicide. Similar antagonism from seed safeners has been noted on other crops (17,26,29), but such reactions were usually apparent when NA was applied to seed in the absence of herbicide treatment.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 62%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Influence of Antidotes on Forage Grass Seedling Response to Metolachlor and Butylate

Griffin¹,

Moser

Martin

1988

Weed sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Field studies were conducted for 3 yr near Mead, NE, to evaluate the effectiveness of seed safeners CGA-92194 [N-(1,3-dioxalon-2-yl-methoxy)iminobenzeneacetonitrile], NA (1,8-naphthalic anhydride), and R-29148 (2,2-dimethyl-5-methyldichloroacetyloxazolidine) to reduce herbicide injury to big bluestem (Andropogon gerardiiVitman), indiangrass[Sorghastrum nutans(L.) Nash], intermediate wheatgrass[Agropyron intermedium(Host.) Beauv.], sideoats grama[Bouteloua curtipendula(Michx.) Torr.], and switchgrass (Panicum virgatumL.) from preplant-incorporated butylate [5-ethyl bis-(2-methylpropyl)carbamothioate] and metolachlor [2-chloro-N- (2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl) -N- (2-methoxy-l-methylethyl)acetamide], applied at 4.5 and 2.2 kg ai/ha, respectively. Big bluestem stands were satisfactory, regardless of herbicide or safener treatment, although stands were reduced by NA treatment with either herbicide. Indiangrass stands varied by year, with protection from both herbicides by R-29148 in 1984 and by NA in 1985. All safeners reduced injury to intermediate wheatgrass from metolachlor and to a lesser extent from butylate; acceptable stands were obtained with metolachlor treatment when unsafened. Sideoats grama was nearly eliminated with either herbicide, regardless of safener. Switchgrass treated with NA produced stands two- to threefold higher than other safened or unsafened seed in metolachlor plots and equal to unsafened seed in the weeded control plots.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 62%

“…Much of the previous research has focused on protection of corn (Zea mays L.) (3,4,13,15,16) and grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] (8,9,17,19,29).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Antidotes on Forage Grass Seedling Response to Metolachlor and Butylate

Griffin¹,

Moser

Martin

1988

Weed sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The potential of using NA as a safener against metolachlor and alachlor injury has been tested, and it has been shown that NA can prevent herbicide injury from these herbicides in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] (1,10,20,22) and against alachlor injury to corn (2). These studies were conducted to de termine whether NA could protect onion roots from the permeability changes induced by metolachlor.…”

Section: Effect Of Metolachlor On the Permeability Of Root Cell Membrmentioning

confidence: 99%

Metolachlor and Alachlor Effects on Membrane Permeability and Lipid Synthesis

Mellis¹,

Pillai²,

Davis³

et al. 1982

Weed sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide] at 1 × 10−5and 1 × 10−4M increased the leakage of previously absorbed,32P-labeled orthophosphate from the roots of onion (Allium cepaL.), a susceptible species, by 14 and 41 times the control values, respectively. A significant amount of32P leaked from the roots of the moderately susceptible species, cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL. ‘DPL 61′) and cucumber (Cucumis sativusL. ‘Ashley′), whereas no significant loss of32P occurred from two tolerant species, soybean [Glycine max(L.) Merr. ‘Bragg′] and corn (Zea maysL. ‘Pioneer 3369A′). At either 1 × 10−7or 1 × 10−6M, 1,8-naphthalic anhydride (NA) prevented32P leakage from onion roots in the presence of 1 × 10−5M metolachlor. High concentrations of NA [0.1% (w/v) suspensions], however, promoted32P leakage and did not protect onion roots from the leakage induced by high concentrations (1 × 10−4M) of metolachlor. Neither metolachlor nor alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide], at 1 × 10−4M, inhibited the uptake of acetate-2-14C or malonic acid-2-14C into excised cotton root tips or the incorporation of the precursors into lipids. Similarly, neither herbicide inhibited phospholipid synthesis by cotton root tips. Incorporation of14C-choline chloride into phosphatidylcholine was not significantly inhibited by metolachlor.

show abstract

“…Metolachlor and alachlor are acetanilide herbicides that effectively control many grassy weeds in numerous field crops (10) but may injure grain sorghum (2,3,4,5,8,9,11). Ketchersid et al (5) reported that metolachlor and alachlor treatments severely injured grain sorghum growing in controlled environment chambers if the surface soil was moist for 1 day or longer prior to emergence, bu t did not injure grain sorghum if the surface soil remained dry up to emergence.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Antidotes Reduce Injury to Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) from Acetanilide Herbicides

et al. 1983

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

CGA-43089 [α-(cyanomethoximino)-benzacetonitrile], CGA-92194 {α-[(1,3-dioxolan-2-yl-methyl)imino] benzeneacetonitrile}, and MON-4606 [5-thiazolecarboxylic acid, benzyl ester, 2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)], applied as seed treatments at 1.25 g/kg seed, prevented yield losses in grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor(L.) Moench.] in the field due to metolachlor [2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)acetamide], alachlor [2-chloro-2′, 6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide] or acetochlor [2-chloro-N-(ethoxymethyl)-6′-ethyl-o-acetotoluidide] applied at 1.7, 2.2 and 1.7 kg/ha, respectively. CGA-92194, applied at 0.8 g/kg seed, prevented yield reduction from metolachlor applied at 4.5 kg/ha. MON-4606 was more effective in protecting grain sorghum when applied as a seed treatment than when applied in the furrow with a clay or sand granule as carrier.

show abstract

Protection of plants from herbicides with 1,8-naphthalic anhydride as illustrated with sorghum

Cited by 18 publications

References 1 publication

Influence of Antidotes on Forage Grass Seedling Response to Metolachlor and Butylate

Influence of Antidotes on Forage Grass Seedling Response to Metolachlor and Butylate

Metolachlor and Alachlor Effects on Membrane Permeability and Lipid Synthesis

Antidotes Reduce Injury to Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) from Acetanilide Herbicides

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About