Protein-Imprinted Polymers: The Shape of Things to Come?

Abstract

The potential to develop materials with antibody-like molecular recognition properties has helped sustain interest in protein-imprinted polymers over the past several decades. Unfortunately, despite persistent research, the field of noncovalent protein imprinting has seen limited success in terms of achieving materials with high selectivity and high affinity. In this Perspective, important yet sometimes overlooked aspects of the imprinting and binding processes are reviewed to help understand why there has been limited success. In particular, the imprinting and binding processes are viewed through the scope of free radical polymerization and hydrogel swelling theories to underscore the complexity of the synthesis and behavior of protein-imprinted polymers. Additionally, we review the metrics of success commonly used in protein imprinting literature (i.e., adsorption capacity, imprinting factor, and selectivity factor) and consider the relevance of each to the characterization of an imprinted polymer’s recognition characteristics. Throughout, common shortcomings are highlighted, and experiments that could help verify or disprove the efficacy of noncovalent protein imprinting are discussed.

Protein‐Structure‐Directed Metal–Organic Zeolite‐like Networks as Biomacromolecule Carriers

“…Until now, template molecules have typically comprised small inorganic, organic or organic–inorganic species and the use of proteins as templating agents is yet to be reported. In polymer chemistry, proteins have been applied as removable templates to fabricate molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs), which can be used for protein recognition . These results inspired us to explore if proteins, especially bioactive enzymes, can indeed be used as templates to form new ZMOFs which can inherit the function of proteins (for example, catalysis, recognition, and sensing).…”

Recent Advances in Smart Biomaterials for the Detection and Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases

“…[138] While there has been research to develop synthetic alternatives to antibodies, such as protein-imprinted polymers, several studies have found that these materials may not offer any significant advantages over their nonimprinted counterparts. [139,140] Ultimately, the choice of recognition element is dependent on the desired biomarker and fluid for detection; protein-specific antibodies and aptamers have been found to work best for proteins with lower concentrations or in protein-rich biofluids and synthetic or less specific agents are able to offer lower cost alternatives for biomarkers that are major components of the target sample.…”

Soft‐Nanoparticle Functionalization of Natural Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering Applications

“…To facilitate the formation of functional tissues, advanced biomaterials with controlled physical, chemical, biological, and electrical properties should be designed . Hydrogels are one of the few biomaterials that possess properties required for tissue engineering applications .…”