22nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications - Workshops (Aina Workshops 2008) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/waina.2008.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protein Structure Comparison and Alignment Using Residue Contexts

Abstract: We introduce a method for comparing protein structures using the notion of residue contexts based on protein Cα-atom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This direct approach to feature representation can be grouped into three general types: one based on the spatial atom distribution (Daras et al, 2006), a second on its topological structure (Anne, 2004), and a third on its geometrical shape (Sayre & Singh, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This direct approach to feature representation can be grouped into three general types: one based on the spatial atom distribution (Daras et al, 2006), a second on its topological structure (Anne, 2004), and a third on its geometrical shape (Sayre & Singh, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indirect representation can be organized into two types: based on statistical analysis of amino acid residues [5][6][7][8], and based on amino acid indices [9,10]. Another approach executes directly analysis on protein spatial structure to obtain representation and extract feature of structure, and can be grouped into three types: based on spatial atom distribution [11,12], topological structure [13,14], and geometrical shape [15][16][17]. The indirect representation can be always obtained with lower computation cost and higher dimensional feature, but in contrast the direct representation can be acquired with higher computation cost and lower dimensional feature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%