1990
DOI: 10.1002/iroh.19900750503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protozoans—the first food of larval herring (Clupea harengus L.)?

Abstract: I n short-run experiments herring larvae at the end of the yolk sac stage (SL 6.5 t o 8.5 m) were fed with maize and potato starch to investigate the effect of particle size on food selection. About 20% of the larvae ingested these particles during the experiments.I n the case of maize starch (3 to 26 pm grain size) the size classes from 14 t o 25 pm and in the case of potato starch (5 to 80 pm) the size classes larger than 29 pm were preferred. The highest numbers of ingested grains per larva were 150 maize s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, biomass estimates of protozooplankton prey included all organisms between 10 and 200 µm and potential differences in food quality and prey preference were ignored. At Irish Sea stations, more than half of the total protozoan biomass consisted of cells <50 µm and yolk sac larvae of herring prefer prey sizes >29 µm (Spittler et al, 1990). This suggests that a narrow window of preferred prey sizes may have existed for the smallest larvae sampled in this study.…”
Section: Microzooplankton-herring Larvae Linkmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Finally, biomass estimates of protozooplankton prey included all organisms between 10 and 200 µm and potential differences in food quality and prey preference were ignored. At Irish Sea stations, more than half of the total protozoan biomass consisted of cells <50 µm and yolk sac larvae of herring prefer prey sizes >29 µm (Spittler et al, 1990). This suggests that a narrow window of preferred prey sizes may have existed for the smallest larvae sampled in this study.…”
Section: Microzooplankton-herring Larvae Linkmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…As larvae grow, they add various other items to their diet, such as Acartia spp. and Eurytemora affinis copepodites, cladocerans, cirriped nauplii, and gastropod and bivalve veliger larvae (Spittler et al 1990;Busch 1996;Hesse 2010;Lindegren et al 2011;Arula et al 2012;Paulsen et al 2016). Studies on herring populations elsewhere suggest that larvae can be very selective feeders targeting certain copepod species and stages (Checkley 1982;Pepin and Penney 1997;Robert et al 2014).…”
Section: Prey Abundance and Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gut content analysis is only adequate for identifying prey items with hard parts, such as lorica (ciliates) or theca (dinoflagellates). Organisms that lack hard parts (e.g., aloricate ciliates and athecate dinoflagellates) are rapidly digested and are not identifiable in the gut contents (Spittler et al. , 1990; Nagano et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gut content analysis is only adequate for identifying prey items with hard parts, such as lorica (ciliates) or theca (dinoflagellates). Organisms that lack hard parts (e.g., aloricate ciliates and athecate dinoflagellates) are rapidly digested and are not identifiable in the gut contents (Spittler et al, 1990;Nagano et al, 2000;Figueiredo et al, 2007). Even if all prey items were discernible in the gut contents, there may be a high percentage of empty guts sampled as a result of regurgitation and ⁄ or defecation during the sampling process, which could lead to an underestimation of prey available to fish larvae (Figueiredo et al, 2005;Pepin and Dower, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%