2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.96.064509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity Eliashberg theory of electrostatic field-effect doping in superconducting films

Abstract: We calculate the effect of a static electric field on the critical temperature of a s-wave one band superconductor in the framework of proximity effect Eliashberg theory. In the weak electrostatic field limit the theory has no free parameters while, in general, the only free parameter is the thickness of the surface layer where the electric field acts. We conclude that the best situation for increasing the critical temperature is to have a very thin film of a superconducting material with a strong increase of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
5
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the agreement is clearly sound from a qualitative point of view, care has to be taken with assuming this to be a true quantitative estimation: first, this heuristic comparison neglects the "stretching" of the accumulation layer towards the potential barrier for large fields; second, different choices of the perturbation threshold may lead to different estimations of the number of atomic layers involved. On the other hand, we stress that the experimental values are determined employing a model assuming a simple step-like behavior for the induced charge density [23,46], which is an even rougher approximation of the real system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the agreement is clearly sound from a qualitative point of view, care has to be taken with assuming this to be a true quantitative estimation: first, this heuristic comparison neglects the "stretching" of the accumulation layer towards the potential barrier for large fields; second, different choices of the perturbation threshold may lead to different estimations of the number of atomic layers involved. On the other hand, we stress that the experimental values are determined employing a model assuming a simple step-like behavior for the induced charge density [23,46], which is an even rougher approximation of the real system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(23), we here set q(z) = 1, to account for the expectation that likely for the true screening length λ T F k F 1. The second-order correction (24) is neglibile for these parameters, being higher order in λ 2 T F eE/(Lω c ), and the nonlinearity visible in the result originates from g(ξ).…”
Section: A Size Effect In Electric Fieldmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…16 for a historical review), and the effect of electric fields on superconducting surfaces are theoretically discussed in several works. [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In these, effects on the amplitude of superconductivity (T c ) are usually related to modulation of electronic density of states (DOS), which is also what contributes to the quantum size effects. A common approach is to consider "surface doping" and assume the DOS is modified within a Thomas-Fermi screening length from the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Starting from the 50s several gating experiments showed the impact of electrostatic charging on the conductivity of metallic thin films [1][2][3] and on the transition temperature of metallic superconductors [4,5]. Furthermore, recent calculations about gating on a metallic superconductor (Pb) showed that the electric field penetrates for a maximum depth of a few times the Thomas-Fermi length and the perturbation to superconductivity extends into the bulk of the superconductor for at least one coherence length [6]. Conventional solid gating allows to realize electric fields of the order of maximum 10 9 V/m.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%