2020
DOI: 10.17860/mersinefd.665406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psikolojik Esneklik Ölçeği: Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Abstract: Öz: Bu çalışmanın amacı bireylerin psikolojik esnekliklerini ölçen Psikolojik Esneklik Ölçeğinin Türkçe forumunun psikometrik özelliklerini incelemektir. Psikolojik Esneklik Ölçeği, Francis, Dawson ve Golijani-Moghaddam (2016) tarafından geliştirilmiştir. Çalışma, 310 yetişkin bireyin katılımıyla yürütülmüştür. SPSS 22.0 paket programı ile yapılan açımlayıcı faktör analizine göre 28maddeden ve beş boyuttan oluşan modelin iyi uyum değerlerine sahip olduğu değerlendirilmiştir (KMO=0.789; X2= 3096.080; p= 0.00). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
10

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…High PFS scores indicate a high level of psychological exibility. The Cronbach's alpha value of the scale is 0.79 [21]. The Cronbach's alpha value of this study was 0.62.…”
Section: Psychological Flexibility Scalementioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…High PFS scores indicate a high level of psychological exibility. The Cronbach's alpha value of the scale is 0.79 [21]. The Cronbach's alpha value of this study was 0.62.…”
Section: Psychological Flexibility Scalementioning
confidence: 51%
“…The Psychological Flexibility Scale (PFS) was developed by Francis and Dawson [20] and the validity and reliability of its Turkish version was checked by Karakuş and Akbay [21]. The PFS is a seven-point Likerttype scale comprising 5 subscales (values and values-driven behavior, being in the moment, acceptance, contextual self, and dissociation) and 28 items.…”
Section: Psychological Flexibility Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many various characteristics may be used to classify the notion of innovation, including individual and social demands, differences, prior experiences, and past experiences. Rogers categorizes innovation in general with the five types listed below (Kılıçer and Odabaşı, 2010):…”
Section: Conceptual Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cronbach α internal consistency coefficient of the scale developed by Francis, Dawson and Golijani-Moghaddam (2016) was found to be .90 for openness to experience subscale, .87 for behavioral awareness subscale, .90 for life subscale in line with values, and .91 for total scale. The scale, which was adapted to Turkish context by Karakuş and Akbay (2020), consists of 28 items, and it is a 7-point Likert (1 = strongly disagree; 7 = totally agree) type. The scale has five sub-dimensions: instant (7 items), acceptance (5 items), contextual self (3 items), dissociation (3 items), and behavior in line with values (10 items).…”
Section: Psychological Flexibility Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficient of the scale is .79. Considering the reliability of the sub-dimensions, it can be said that the dimension of behavior in the direction of value is .84; being in the moment is .60; accepting is .72; contextual self is .73, and separation is .59 (Karakuş & Akbay, 2020) respectively. For the present study, the Cronbach alpha coefficients according to the subdimensions are .70 for contextual self.…”
Section: Psychological Flexibility Scalementioning
confidence: 99%