2018
DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties evaluation of the Psychological Empowerment Instrument in a Brazilian context

Abstract: Aim:To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Psychological Empowerment Instrument among Brazilian nurses.Background: The Psychological Empowerment Instrument-Brazil is a structured questionnaire that aims to measure the psychological empowerment in the work environment. Method:A methodological study involving 219 nurses. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the factor structure validity of the Psychological Empowerment Instrument-Brazil. Model fit indices and saliences of factor loading… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Internationally, this instrument has been used successfully in more than 50 studies. The PES has been adopted in different contexts, including studies conducted in Brazil and Turkey [ 25 , 26 ], and showed suitable adequate validity and reliability when applied in different contexts as well as its original one in the United States [ 5 , 25 , 26 ]. For the current study, validity was evaluated by using a panel of experts (two faculty members and four clinical nurses) in the practice to check if the study topic was adequately represented in the questionnaire.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internationally, this instrument has been used successfully in more than 50 studies. The PES has been adopted in different contexts, including studies conducted in Brazil and Turkey [ 25 , 26 ], and showed suitable adequate validity and reliability when applied in different contexts as well as its original one in the United States [ 5 , 25 , 26 ]. For the current study, validity was evaluated by using a panel of experts (two faculty members and four clinical nurses) in the practice to check if the study topic was adequately represented in the questionnaire.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this, to increase empirical evidence for construct validity, the convergent and discriminant validity of the scale was calculated based on the results obtained in the CFA [77]. To this end, the adoption of the Fornell-Larcker criterion [78] has been widely accepted by many authors [79][80][81][82][83][84][85]. This criterion postulates that the convergent validity of the measurement model can be assessed using the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) and Composite Reliability (CR), whereas the discriminant validity can be assessed by comparing the amount of the variance captured by the construct (AVE) and the shared variance with other constructs.…”
Section: Validity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En todos estos casos, el cuestionario ha dado muy buenos resultados psicométricos. Además, aunque este instrumento fue creado originalmente en inglés, existen diferentes traducciones y adaptaciones posteriores a diversas lenguas como el español (Albar et al, 2012), portugués (Santos et al, 2014;Schumaher et al, 2019), chino (Sun et al, 2011) y turco (Uner y Turan, 2010).…”
Section: Medidas Del Empoderamiento Psicológicounclassified