2007
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory‐II in nonclinical adolescent samples

Abstract: This study examined the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II; A. T. Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996) in samples of high-school adolescents (N=414; 210 boys and 204 girls, ages 14-18 years). Confirmatory factor analyses provided satisfactory fit estimates for the two- and three-factor oblique solutions reported frequently in the extant literature. The solution to a general factor with domain-specific somatic and cognitive-affective factors was examined as an altern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
121
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
12
121
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…21,58,67,73,87,101,105 Although still scant, the bifactor model (G) was able to identify a non-hierarchical general depression in addition to the traditional two-dimensional structure. 18,34,64,81,84,96,121 These investigations shared the view that much of the variance of the BDI-II items can be accounted for by a hierarchical higher order or a parallel dimension of depression, where much of the common variance can be explained by a general construct. Practitioners should be careful when interpreting subscale scores, which might be greatly related to the heterogeneous characteristics of depressive conditions.…”
Section: Content and Construct Validitymentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21,58,67,73,87,101,105 Although still scant, the bifactor model (G) was able to identify a non-hierarchical general depression in addition to the traditional two-dimensional structure. 18,34,64,81,84,96,121 These investigations shared the view that much of the variance of the BDI-II items can be accounted for by a hierarchical higher order or a parallel dimension of depression, where much of the common variance can be explained by a general construct. Practitioners should be careful when interpreting subscale scores, which might be greatly related to the heterogeneous characteristics of depressive conditions.…”
Section: Content and Construct Validitymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…105 It is noteworthy that suicidal ideation, which is one of the core features of depression and an item on the BDI-II, correlated only poorly to moderately with the instrument. 8,81 More investigations should be conducted to document concurrent validity in comparison with wellknown constructs.…”
Section: Concurrent and Discriminant Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is a 21-item tool often used in screening for depression (Beck, 1973;Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996;Gray et al, 2009;Oliveira-Brochado & Oliveira-Brochado, 2008;Osman, Barrios, Gutierrez, Williams, & Bailey, 2008). Its scores are often expressed as ranges apparently related to degrees of depression severity (mild, moderate, severe) but the utility and validity of this differentiation has not been substantively demonstrated.…”
Section: Other Self-report Scales Of Depression In Adolescents In Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…se ha documentado evidencia de validez convergente tras correlacionar fuertemente con medidas de depresión y ansiedad (araya et al 2013), desesperanza y síntomas internalizados, así como validez divergente al relacionarse débilmente con escalas de apoyo social y síntomas externalizados (VanVoorhis y Blumentritt, 2007). Distintos trabajos han informado puntos de corte que varían de acuerdo con la muestra, pero en general Validez de constructo del inVentario de depresión de Beck ii para adolescentes coinciden en que el BDI-II posee sensibilidad y especificidad aceptables, así como una confiabilidad adecuada que oscila entre .90 y .91 (Melipillán, cova, rincón y Valdivia, 2008;osman, Barrios, gutierrez, Williams y Bailey, 2008;Uslu et al 2008).…”
unclassified
“…el modelo de dos factores, cognitivo-afectivo y somático-vegetativo, originalmente informado por Beck et al (1996) en población general, se ha corroborado sólo parcialmente (osman et al, 2008;Wu y chang, 2008). se supone que en el primer factor, cognitivo-afectivo, habrían de agruparse reactivos como tristeza, sentimientos de culpa, autocrítica, etc.…”
unclassified