Psychosocial Adjustment in Children and Adolescents with a Craniofacial Anomaly: Age and Sex Patterns

Pope, Alice W.; Snyder, Heather T.

doi:10.1597/04-043r.1

Cited by 61 publications

(54 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These data corroborate the fi ndings of Ha et al (2013), Hunt et al (2005), Murray et al (2010), and Pope and Snyder (2005), who identifi ed clinical indications of anxiety/depression and attention problems in preschool children with orofacial clefts.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

“…This fi nding is supported by the study by Murray et al (2010), which found increased risk for socioemotional diffi culties in children with orofacial clefts, with indicators of anxious, introspective and depressed behaviors, as well as diffi culties in social interactions, typical of internalizing behaviors. Another study that confi rms the results found is that of Pope and Snyder (2005), in which clinical scores for isolation problems were observed in children with craniofacial anomalies in the 2 to 3 years age group and internalizing problems, such as attention and thought problems and introversion, in the 4 years age group.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 71%

“…Psychosocial adjustment and social skill problems were investigated by Pope and Snyder (2005), in a sample of 724 children with congenital craniofacial anomalies, aged 2 to 18 years, through the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), developed by Achenbach and Rescorla (2001). They found clinical scores for isolation problems in children of 2 to 3 years of age.…”

Section: Palabras Clavementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Behavioral Problems in Preschool Children with Orofacial Clefts

Silva¹,

Rodrigues²,

Lauris³

2017

Temas Psicol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study aimed to evaluate behavioral problems in 83 children with orofacial clefts and to test for possible correlations between these problems and the following variables: gender, age and cleft type. The instruments used were: Interview Protocol and the CBCL. Descriptive analysis of the data was performed using measures of frequency and percentage and the Chi-squared test was used to test for possible correlations. The results showed a higher frequency of externalizing behavior problems in boys. Higher rates of internalizing problems (62.2%) and total problems (46.7%) were also found in older children. Regarding the relationship between cleft type and behavioral problems, a prevalence of internalizing behaviors was observed, regardless of the type. Considering the behavioral profi le that composes the internalizing and externalizing scales, an association between male gender and aggressive behavior was observed; between the 3 years to 4 years 3 months age group and aggressive behavior; and between the pre-incisive foramen cleft and trans-incisive foramen cleft types and internalizing behavior, with emphasis on anxiety/depression problems (50% and 27.1% respectively). It is considered that these data can contribute to the planning of preventive and interventional actions, as internalizing and externalizing behaviors reduce the opportunity for adequate interactions and, hence social development.Keywords: Children's behavior, behavior problems, cleft lip and palate. Problemas Comportamentais em Crianças Pré-Escolares com Fissura LabiopalatinaResumo O presente estudo objetivou identifi car problemas de comportamento de 83 crianças com fi ssura labiopalatina e testar a correlação entre esses problemas e as variáveis sexo, idade e tipo de fi ssura.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 71%

Section: Palabras Clavementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Behavioral Problems in Preschool Children with Orofacial Clefts

Silva¹,

Rodrigues²,

Lauris³

2017

Temas Psicol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The type of attentiveness that was assessed is not always specified, and is done by assessing the behavior of children; [24][25][26][27][28][29] other studies use individual tests to evaluate a specific type of attention. [30][31][32][33] Attention difficulties have been reported in subjects with reading impairment, 34 dyslexia, 35 aphasia, 36 sclerosis, 37 ADHD, 38 APD, 39 sleep deprivation,40 and cleft lip and palate.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[30][31][32][33] Attention difficulties have been reported in subjects with reading impairment, 34 dyslexia, 35 aphasia, 36 sclerosis, 37 ADHD, 38 APD, 39 sleep deprivation,40 and cleft lip and palate. 32,28 Studies relating sustained auditory attentiveness and cleft lip and palate were not found in our review; we thus tried to correlate this study with those that included subjects with a history of recurring otitis. [9][10][11][12][13] We were aware that these studies were subject to methodological issues, including the retrospective studies that contain biases and imprecise methods for detecting OME.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Teste de Habilidade de Atenção Auditiva Sustentada (THAAS) em crianças de sete anos com fissura labiopalatina

Lemos¹,

Feniman²

2010

Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cl eft lip and palate (CLP) is a risk indicator to middle ear alterations, which may damage the development of auditory abilities such as attention that is essential to learn new skills, oral and written communication. Studies on attention process with CLP population are recent and poorly explored in the specific literature. Thus, this study aims to contribute with new subsidies in the field as it investigates the performance of children with CLP in Sustained Auditory Attention Ability Test (SAAAT). Material and Method: Comparison of SAAAT performance between children with CLP and children without it. Prospective study. Results: ANOVA was used as variance analysis model with two factors to study the variables such as group and gender. The CLP group showed an average of 2.5 units higher than the control group. This difference is between 0.7 and 4.4 with 95% certain. Conclusion: children with cleft lip and palate had poorer performance on SAAAT when compared to those without such craniofacial anomaly, considering attention reduction only.

show abstract

Psychosocial Adjustment of Patients with Congenital Craniofacial Malformations

Meyer

2021

Fundamentals of Craniofacial Malformations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psychosocial Adjustment in Children and Adolescents with a Craniofacial Anomaly: Age and Sex Patterns

Cited by 61 publications

References 25 publications

Behavioral Problems in Preschool Children with Orofacial Clefts

Behavioral Problems in Preschool Children with Orofacial Clefts

Teste de Habilidade de Atenção Auditiva Sustentada (THAAS) em crianças de sete anos com fissura labiopalatina

Psychosocial Adjustment of Patients with Congenital Craniofacial Malformations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About