Public-private partnerships: approaches to assessing economic effects for stakeholders

Markovskaya, Elizaveta; Holodkova, Victoria; Radushinsky, Dmitry; Feoktistova, Oksana Gennadyevna; Borisova, Anzhelika

doi:10.1051/matecconf/201817001047

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The second is to stimulate the accelerated development of such areas of innovative economic activity, which have shown their resistance to the consequences of quarantine and self-isolation measures, using government regulation and certain planning tools, for example, indicative ones [20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Indicative planning of the innovative development of a federal state in the context of the activation of unforeseen factors of a radical nature (at example of the COVID-19 pandemic)

Ladykova

Danilov

2020

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the article is to identify the main socio-economic causes and consequences of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic in indicative planning of the innovative development of a federal state, as well as the ways to overcome the negative consequences as a new and substantial example of impact of unforeseen factors of a radical nature to a federal state. The main fundamental consequences of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic appear to be two interrelated innovation processes (coronavirus’ affects): accelerated digitalization of all aspects of socioeconomic activity, as well as socio-economic innovation, namely “zeroing”, i.e. gradual displacement of a person from many processes where he is currently carrying out labor activities. In order to overcome the negative consequences of the coronavirus pandemic COVID-19 and other unforeseen factors of a radical nature federal states of the countries and region governments are apt use the tools of innovation and indicative planning.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Indicative planning of the innovative development of a federal state in the context of the activation of unforeseen factors of a radical nature (at example of the COVID-19 pandemic)

Ladykova

Danilov

2020

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This concept in relation to the strategy of medium-, long-term development of higher education organizations, despite the non-systemic, individual declaration -a generalizing dominant in the program and project organizational and economic, socio-cultural, scientific and innovative, financial and investment transformations of current activities and the prospective development of higher education organizations education, is one of the technological elements of such an organizational innovation as strategic planning [11,12,13].…”

Section: Features Of the Concept Of "Strategy" Within The Relation Tomentioning

confidence: 99%

Creation of a strategic planning system for the socio-economic and innovative development of organizations of higher education

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article reveals the theoretical and methodological provisions for the formation of the composition of technological elements of the strategic planning system, their interaction with the resource components of the organization of higher education (on the example of Voronezh and St.Petersburg universities) to achieve generalizing and specific targets of quantitative and qualitative nature of the strategic the goal of long-term development of a higher education institution. The concepts of “strategy”, “strategic vision”, “mission of the organization of higher education” are defined. The possibility of optimizing resource consumption in the process of implementing complex measures within the framework of federal, regional, sectoral and local programs and projects of social, economic and innovative development of higher education organizations is substantiated. The priority directions in the development strategy of the analyzed universities are highlighted. The necessity of including such technological elements as strategic analysis, mission, strategic vision, strategic goal, generalizing (basic) strategy, functional (private) strategies in the system of strategic planning of socio-economic and innovative development of the studied universities is substantiated.

show abstract

“…In conclusion, it should be noted that any involvedment in a PPP necessitates an interest in the project. As a private investor, this will take the form of financial benefits, and for the state party, in the form of the implementation necessary for the requirements of the state, e.g., to ensure public infrastructure, social facilities and other such tasks,as are traditionally resolved at the state level [17].…”

Section: Approaches To Building a Financial Model And Assessing The Ementioning

confidence: 99%

Public-Private Partnerships: Does Russian Practice Follow International Experience?

Markovskaya¹,

Holodkova²,

Radushinsky³

2019

КФ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Business partnerships between state agencies and private sector entities represent one of the most common forms ofinteraction between government and the business sector. Moreover, these public-private partnership (PPP) projects canbe a major and effective catalyst for significant social and commercial development in the public sphere.This article is devoted to an analysis of recent changes in the legislative base concerning PPP in the Russian Federation.We intend to identify pragmatic approaches toward assessing the economic effects of PPP involvement for potentialstakeholders, as well as constructing models of financial frameworks for mapping the PPP project implementation. Thisarticle presents the result of testing the financial model that we propose. The ultimate intention is that this model can beused in the preparation of concession agreements and negotiation in the preparation of PPP projects.To achieve this, we analyze the legal framework and development trends of public-private partnership projects,both theoretically and practically. We consider and evaluate PPP from the point of view of 3 aspects: organizational,methodological and managerial. To achieve this, we must identify the interests of the various stakeholders who aredirectly or indirectly interested in the practical results of the project in both a material and a sociopolitical sense.For each of the stakeholders, we identify areas for them to evaluate in the process of analyzing potential PPP projects.This includes the potential quantitative and qualitative results of a project that can be identified and, as a rule, measured,which allows for a standard approach to political and commercial evaluation. As a result, we present an algorithm forbuilding a financial model which accounts for material and seemingly immaterial variablesIt is suggested that this approach to building a financial model and evaluating the effects of PPP projects provides auniquely useful perspective on the field. We utilize the most modern methods for assessing risks, benefits and effects forvarious stakeholders of projects implemented in the form of PPP, and as a result this paper provides ample opportunityfor further development of research. The presentation of the evaluation algorithm for PPP stakeholders takes intoaccount the complex structure of the partnership participants and will be useful for academic, commercial, andadministrative parties.

show abstract

Public-private partnerships: approaches to assessing economic effects for stakeholders

Cited by 5 publications

References 13 publications

Indicative planning of the innovative development of a federal state in the context of the activation of unforeseen factors of a radical nature (at example of the COVID-19 pandemic)

Indicative planning of the innovative development of a federal state in the context of the activation of unforeseen factors of a radical nature (at example of the COVID-19 pandemic)

Creation of a strategic planning system for the socio-economic and innovative development of organizations of higher education

Public-Private Partnerships: Does Russian Practice Follow International Experience?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About