Publication Incidence of Abstracts Presented at the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Meeting: 2010 to 2014

Factors associated with the publication outcomes of paediatric proceedings presented at 2010‐2016 the International Associations for Dental Research annual meetings

“…Scientific conferences are vital academic platforms to share current findings and enlighten future research. Though hard to quantify, some authors have suggested that the publication status of the presentations might be an indicator that can be used to evaluate the quality and value of a scientific conference . We assessed the characteristics and publication status of abstracts presented at 2010‐2016 IADR annual meetings, which were related to paediatric oral research.…”

“…The difference between oral presentations and poster was not surprising. Generally, poster sessions often accept more abstracts and aim to provide a platform for junior researchers to present their research, whereas abstracts selected for oral sessions are required to be higher‐quality to maximize the impact on the attendees …”

“…Though hard to quantify, some authors have suggested that the publication status of the presentations might be an indicator that can be used to evaluate the quality and value of a scientific conference. 3,4 We assessed the characteristics and publication status of abstracts presented at 2010-2016 IADR annual meetings, which were related to paediatric oral research. And, we also conducted Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis, which were often used for survivor analysis, to find the factors influencing publications.…”

“…Scientific meetings are irreplaceable platforms to share the lasted research findings with specialists and peer groups, whereas the quality and validity of these meetings have been a concern . It is suggested that the publication rate of the presented abstracts might be an indicator that can be used to evaluate the success and value of a scientific conference . Generally, publication in peer‐reviewed journals often needs to expose more research details and it usually has wider dissemination to the public .…”

“…1,2 It is suggested that the publication rate of the presented abstracts might be an indicator that can be used to evaluate the success and value of a scientific conference. [3][4][5] Generally, publication in peer-reviewed journals often needs to expose more research details and it usually has wider dissemination to the public. 6 Previous studies have stated that the rates of publication have ranged from 16.5% to 78%, varying with different meetings and specialties.…”