2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1046-5928(02)00566-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Purification and characterization of recombinant microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
54
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
54
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 depicts a substratelimited assay that measured absolute product formation (nanograms) as described in Materials and Methods. Incubations with native enzyme in the presence of GSH resulted in near total conversion of PGH 2 to PGE 2 and are concurrent with the specific activity previously reported in the literature (∼4 μmol·min −1 ·mg −1 at 0°C) (28). A negative control involved microsomal preparations of WT mPGES-1 resuspended in buffer containing the GSH analog, GOH, that differs from the native cofactor only by the replacement of the thiol moiety by a hydroxyl group and did not produce product above background levels.…”
Section: Significancesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…1 depicts a substratelimited assay that measured absolute product formation (nanograms) as described in Materials and Methods. Incubations with native enzyme in the presence of GSH resulted in near total conversion of PGH 2 to PGE 2 and are concurrent with the specific activity previously reported in the literature (∼4 μmol·min −1 ·mg −1 at 0°C) (28). A negative control involved microsomal preparations of WT mPGES-1 resuspended in buffer containing the GSH analog, GOH, that differs from the native cofactor only by the replacement of the thiol moiety by a hydroxyl group and did not produce product above background levels.…”
Section: Significancesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Possible explanations can be the difference in lipid composition between eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells, alternatively different post-transcriptional processing. In addition, we report significant but low GST and peroxidase activities in contrast to Ouellet et al (52), findings that are principally very important for the further understanding of the mPGES-1 reaction.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…PGD 3 was the predominant EPAderived metabolite produced in EPA-supplemented cells and was about threefold higher than in control cells; however, EPA COX metabolites were 100-fold lower than AA prostanoids. H-PGDS and mPGES-1 have about 17% and 30% activity with PGH 3 vs. PGH 2 (8,(19)(20)(21)(22), respectively.…”
Section: Effects Of Pufa Supplementation On Tlr4-stimulated Eicosanoidmentioning
confidence: 97%