2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2016.12.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QCPV: A quality control algorithm for distributed photovoltaic array power output

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary difference of the two methods is the equation for deriving the GTI from the P ac . From Killinger et al (2016) and Killinger et al (2017), the specific power may be represented by Eq. (13):…”
Section: Comparison With a Power-projection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary difference of the two methods is the equation for deriving the GTI from the P ac . From Killinger et al (2016) and Killinger et al (2017), the specific power may be represented by Eq. (13):…”
Section: Comparison With a Power-projection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to factors such as measurement uncertainty or irradiance modeling error, experimental data often contain spurious values. There is no universally-accepted QC procedure (Gueymard and Ruiz-Arias, 2016), but recommended QC methods for surface radiation measurements (Long and Shi, 2008;García et al, 2014) and PV power output (Killinger et al, 2017) do exist. Recently, owing to the advances in remote-sensing technology, satellite-derived irradiance products have been shown to help perform QC on irradiance measurements (Urraca et al, 2017;Perez et al, 2017).…”
Section: Some Seemingly Trivial Implementation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gathering all these metadata is difficult and time consuming. Moreover, when available, the data contained in databases could be imprecise or flawed [23]. This could lead to erroneous estimations.…”
Section: Outline and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%