“…In the considered ENV-OA-PPL class of NES the prevalence of Еfree, that is capable of ordering structural formations and making them more complex, over Еbound, uncapable of doing any kind of work, forms the trend for the continuity of self-organization in the structural formations of these NES, where the natural environment continues to play the main role. The prevalence of bound (low-quality) energy of stream over Еfree results in the trend for an increasing entropy within the considered ENV-OA-PPL NES and thus in a decline in functional efficiency and gradual degradation (Bondarenko, Skibin, Azarov, Semenova and Privalenko VV 2016;Bondarenko, Klimenko, Semenova and Nikolaenko 2016;Khetsuriani, Bondarenko and Yliasov 2019;Bondarenko, Yliasov and Khetsuriani 2019;Bondarenko, Privalenko, Kuvalkin et al 2009;Bondarenko, Gutenev, Privalenko and Polyakov 2007;Bondarenko, Privalenko, Kuvalkin et al 2009;Budyko and Avakyan 1977;Budyko and Drozdov 1950;Methodological Approaches to Environmental Regulation...1996;Chernyaev 1998;Guideline for Chemical Analysis...1977;Rumyantsev and Kozlov 1999;Fashchevskiy 1989;Federal Law 174-FZ On Environmental Appraisal 1995;Bondarenko, Dyachenko, Gutenev and Fedoryan 2009;Mosaferi, Pourakbar, Shakerkhatibi et al 2014;Rezaeinia, Nasseri, Binesh et al 2018;Aazami, Esmaili-Sari, Abdoli et al 2015). This is why, one of the main components of the methodology of the EIA of OA as part of the ENV-OA-PPL class of NES is enviromental acceptability (EA) that is a certain copy of the natural system in terms of changing forms of energy with the trend for slower entropy growth, which is ensured by the structural fineness of the building as part of the OA.…”