Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3343031.3351028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videos

Abstract: Quality assessment of in-the-wild videos is a challenging problem because of the absence of reference videos and shooting distortions. Knowledge of the human visual system can help establish methods for objective quality assessment of in-the-wild videos. In this work, we show two eminent effects of the human visual system, namely, content-dependency and temporal-memory effects, could be used for this purpose. We propose an objective no-reference video quality assessment method by integrating both effects into … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
245
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 261 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
245
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, we highlight the relationship and difference between our previous work (Li et al 2019a) and this work. The model design in this work is build upon the model in our previous work.…”
Section: Subjective Qualitymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Lastly, we highlight the relationship and difference between our previous work (Li et al 2019a) and this work. The model design in this work is build upon the model in our previous work.…”
Section: Subjective Qualitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For details, our proposed model contains three stages to solve these three sub-problems. First, to predict the relative quality, we use our previous HVSinspired VQA model (Li et al 2019a) as the backbone. The relative quality assessor takes the video as input and outputs a relative quality score.…”
Section: Subjective Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The higher performance of the TLVQM is then justified by the fact that among the low complexity features, it also considers the motion estimation of key-pixels across frames. [13] 0.54 ± 0.10 0.55 ± 0.10 10.30 ± 0.9 0.64 ± 0.06 0.59 ± 0.07 13.10 ± 0.8 V-CORNIA [14] 0.61 ± 0.09 0.56 ± 0.09 9.70 ± 0.9 0.72 ± 0.04 0.67 ± 0.05 11.83 ± 0.7 V-BLIINDS [12] 0.67 ± 0.09 0.60 ± 0.10 9.20 ± 1.0 0.72 ± 0.05 0.69 ± 0.05 11.76 ± 0.8 HIGRADE [15] 0.71 ± 0.08 0.68 ± 0.08 8.60 ± 1.1 0.63 ± 0.06 0.61 ± 0.07 13.03 ± 0.9 TLVQM [24] 0.77 ± 0.06 0.74 ± 0.07 7.62 ± 1.0 0.78 ± 0.04 0.78 ± 0.04 10.75 ± 0.9 VSFA [11] 0.75 ± 0.09 0.71 ± 0.10 8.31 ± Figure 5 shows the scatter plots on the four databases. They report the MOS with respect to the corresponding predicted scores for all the samples considered in the 100 iterations.…”
Section: Performance On Single Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%