2012
DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2012.708247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of higher education: organisational or educational? A content analysis of Chinese university self-evaluation reports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A busca pela excelência e qualidade na educação superior não é preocupação somente do sistema de ensino brasileiro, cujos estudos inclusive despontam do estado do RS (SANTANA et al, 2010), como na presente pesquisa. Recentes manuscritos internacionais reportam a mesma ansiedade a cerca da garantia da qualidade educacional (VARELA-PETITO, 2011;ZOU et al, 2012;LEE et al, 2013;LU;LEMONDE, 2013). Com sistemas de avaliação peculiares, metodologias e prazos distintos, as IES buscam gerenciar a formação do aluno, futuro profissional, com ênfase nos resultados da aprendizagem e na melhoria contínua.…”
Section: Artigounclassified
“…A busca pela excelência e qualidade na educação superior não é preocupação somente do sistema de ensino brasileiro, cujos estudos inclusive despontam do estado do RS (SANTANA et al, 2010), como na presente pesquisa. Recentes manuscritos internacionais reportam a mesma ansiedade a cerca da garantia da qualidade educacional (VARELA-PETITO, 2011;ZOU et al, 2012;LEE et al, 2013;LU;LEMONDE, 2013). Com sistemas de avaliação peculiares, metodologias e prazos distintos, as IES buscam gerenciar a formação do aluno, futuro profissional, com ênfase nos resultados da aprendizagem e na melhoria contínua.…”
Section: Artigounclassified
“…A number of researchers indicate that students are the main stakeholders of higher education and their judgements are valuable (Owlia & Aspinwall, 1996;Sarrico et al, 2010;Srikanthan & Dalrymple, 2003;Rehber, 2007;Zou et al, 2012). In a similar vein, according to Bandevica & Ligotne (2014) student evaluation is the most effective way in quality assessment of the implementation of a higher education program.…”
Section: Participants Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different needs of stakeholders together with the diversity in higher education make the quality content dissimilar, as well (Bandevica & Ligotne, 2014). There seems to be a consensus in the literature on Harvey and Green's (1993) five-dimensional classification with regard to quality in higher education (Bandevica & Ligotne, 2014;Lagrosen et al, 2004;Wittek & Kvernbekk, 2011;Zou et al, 2012). In this classification, quality is defined as exceptional, perfection or consistency, fitness for purpose, value for money and transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational quality of higher education institutions focuses on the quality of teaching and learning. In the pursuit of organisational quality, higher education institutions are focused on being socially visible and recognised as 'good' in order to gain the resources and legitimacy needed for their survival and prosperity (Zou et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%