2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-014-2546-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quality of life in very elderly radiotherapy patients: a prospective pilot study using the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 module

Abstract: In radiotherapy patients ≥80 years, HRQOL was maintained until the end of radiotherapy but deteriorated in general and elderly-specific areas thereafter, suggesting a need to develop specific supportive interventions for this age group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
3
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, the present study is the first study to use the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 questionnaire to explore, after OOPC primary surgical treatment, QoL domains of specific importance for elderly persons. There are few well-conducted studies assessing EORTC QLQ-ELD14 [19]. Interestingly, 6 months after therapy, they showed QoL scores far worse than those observed in the present study regarding mobility, joint stiffness, worries about others, worries about the future, burden of illness and maintaining purpose.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, the present study is the first study to use the EORTC QLQ-ELD14 questionnaire to explore, after OOPC primary surgical treatment, QoL domains of specific importance for elderly persons. There are few well-conducted studies assessing EORTC QLQ-ELD14 [19]. Interestingly, 6 months after therapy, they showed QoL scores far worse than those observed in the present study regarding mobility, joint stiffness, worries about others, worries about the future, burden of illness and maintaining purpose.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…Interestingly, 6 months after therapy, they showed QoL scores far worse than those observed in the present study regarding mobility, joint stiffness, worries about others, worries about the future, burden of illness and maintaining purpose. However, the population included in the Kaufman study was significantly different from the cohort in the present study, with a higher mean patient age, various types of cancer and more patients receiving palliative treatment [19]. The only comparable score between the two studies was the family support score, suggesting that, even when QoL is more severely affected by the cancer and its treatment, family support remains stable and represents a critical source of comfort for patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Each scale has a score range between 0 and 100. While on the first four of these scales, higher scores indicate poorer mobility, more severe joint stiffness, higher degrees of worries about others and future worries, and a higher burden of illness, on the last two of these scales, higher scores stand for better family support and maintenance of autonomy and purpose respectively [ 40 ].…”
Section: Study Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mögliche Reduktion von Koordination, Balance, Muskelkraft und Knochendichte oft in Kombination mit Fatigue [7] können die Alltagsfunktionalität insbesondere bei bereits beeinträchtigten Personen gefährden. In eigenen Beobachtungsstudien bei hochalten Patient / innen (≥80 Jahre) [8] und bei älteren (≥65 Jahre) berichteten die Patient / innen jeweils 6 Monate nach Behandlungsbeginn stärkere Fatigue und geringere körperliche Funktion. In einer weiteren Studie, in der vor Therapiebeginn Risikofaktoren mittels Assessments erfasst und entsprechend adressiert wurden, berichtete ein Teil der Patient / innen ohne Funktionseinschränkungen vor Therapie im 6-Monats Follow-up klinisch relevant reduzierte körperliche Funktionsfähigkeit [9].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified