1993
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2670(93)80608-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of chromatographic data using a matched filter: robustness towards noise model errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of a matched filtration approach to denoising in chromatography (with UV detection) was demonstrated over a decade ago, where the Gaussian function was assumed to characterize the chromatographic peak shape. The cases of both white noise ( P N N = const) 13,14 and colored noise ( P NN proportional to 1/ f ) 15,16 were examined .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The application of a matched filtration approach to denoising in chromatography (with UV detection) was demonstrated over a decade ago, where the Gaussian function was assumed to characterize the chromatographic peak shape. The cases of both white noise ( P N N = const) 13,14 and colored noise ( P NN proportional to 1/ f ) 15,16 were examined .…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cases of both white noise ( P N N = const) 13,14 and colored noise ( P NN proportional to 1/ f ) 15,16 were examined . Cross-correlation with the Gaussian was shown to be robust to the errors in the presumed peak width 14 (e.g., a 2-fold error in peak width resulted in only a 10% decrease in S/N) and to errors in the noise model . The gain G in S/N due to the matched filtration of a Gaussian peak is equal to 8 where n is the number of data points per chromatographic peak.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%