2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of drugs of abuse and some stimulants in hair samples by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are different extraction methods and comparisons between the different extraction protocols have been made [9][10][11][12][13]. The extraction step must be studied with special interest because it is not possible to make a recovery study, although some authors have published methods were they perform a recovery study only soaking the surface of the hair with a drug solution, thus always obtained good recoveries [12,14,15], but the Society of Hair Testing does not recommend this methodology. Its proposed methodology is to expose drug-free hair to aqueous solutions of drugs at high concentrations, for several days and then thoroughly wash the hair before drying and analyzing [16], additionally, these spiked samples can be used for precision studies, routine quality controls, and as internal degradation controls, but not for recovery studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are different extraction methods and comparisons between the different extraction protocols have been made [9][10][11][12][13]. The extraction step must be studied with special interest because it is not possible to make a recovery study, although some authors have published methods were they perform a recovery study only soaking the surface of the hair with a drug solution, thus always obtained good recoveries [12,14,15], but the Society of Hair Testing does not recommend this methodology. Its proposed methodology is to expose drug-free hair to aqueous solutions of drugs at high concentrations, for several days and then thoroughly wash the hair before drying and analyzing [16], additionally, these spiked samples can be used for precision studies, routine quality controls, and as internal degradation controls, but not for recovery studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods have been proposed for the testing of class-specific groups of compounds as amphetamines and other stimulants [15,[17][18][19][20][21], sedatives [22,23], cocaine and opiates [6,15,21,24,25], or cannabis and derivatives [26,27], but there are only a few papers describing extensive screening of multiclass drugs [14,28]. The testing of hair extracts has been made by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry [7,12,19,26,29,30], which has the disadvantage inherent to the gas chromatography, due to the need of derivatization of polar analytes such as most of these drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various analytical methods employed to test hair extracts for abused drugs have been recently reviewed [14]. These methods include derivatization followed by gas chromatography/chemical ionization mass spectrometry [15], liquid chromatography with various mass spectrometers, such as triple quadrupoles [16], ion traps [17], time-of-flight [18] and hybrid linear ion trap-orbitrap mass spectrometers [19]. The use of direct mass spectrometric techniques such as ambient ionization mass spectrometry [20] and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS) [21] have also been described for hair drug testing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, ESI was 266 more extensively utilized than APCI, as in a validated LC-MS/MS method (Miller et al, 2008) that 267 was aimed at the simultaneous quantification of amphetamines, opiates, cocaine and metabolites, and diazepam and metabolites (17 compounds) in post-mortem hair samples. The use of an ion trap 269 mass spectrometer was suggested (Bucelli et al, 2009) to screen 16 drugs of abuse in human hair.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%