2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaap.2020.104829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantification of microplastics in a freshwater suspended organic matter using different thermoanalytical methods – outcome of an interlaboratory comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With recent method refinements [33,122] and novel hyphenations of thermoanalytical sample introduction with FTIR or time-of-flight (TOF) detectors [151], instrumental analytics have become sufficiently sensitive for the quantification of microplastics in the low mg kg −1 to µg kg −1 range. A recent interlaboratory comparison of thermoanalytical methods further showed that thermoanalytical setups involving chromatographical separation were able to reliably identify and quantify PE, PP, PS, and PET in an organic sediment [152]. TGA/MS proved itself particularly useful for the assessment of total polymer contents.…”
Section: Thermoanalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With recent method refinements [33,122] and novel hyphenations of thermoanalytical sample introduction with FTIR or time-of-flight (TOF) detectors [151], instrumental analytics have become sufficiently sensitive for the quantification of microplastics in the low mg kg −1 to µg kg −1 range. A recent interlaboratory comparison of thermoanalytical methods further showed that thermoanalytical setups involving chromatographical separation were able to reliably identify and quantify PE, PP, PS, and PET in an organic sediment [152]. TGA/MS proved itself particularly useful for the assessment of total polymer contents.…”
Section: Thermoanalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of Py-GC-MS over conventional spectroscopic methods is that it is possible to analyze polymer types and organic plastic additives in a single analysis. Researchers compared Py-GC-MS, TED-GC-MS, and TGA-FTIR, and found these methods can correctly identify all polymers and report reasonable quantitative results within the study concentration range (Becker et al, 2020). Mass spectrometry analysis requires that polymer samples are purified and concentrated, vaporized, and then entered into mass spectrometry analysis, as vaporization steps, such as laser ablation, may change or destroy the properties of plastic samples.…”
Section: Chemical Composition Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matsui et al (2020) have presented an algorithm for identifying the composition of heterogeneous mixtures of polymers, successfully identifying four polymer types from an ocean water sample [41]. In terms of what MP characteristics this technique measures, it has been mostly explored for plastic type identification, but has shown potential for relative mass quantification of polymer types in heterogeneous MP samples [40,[42][43][44]84].…”
Section: Technology Demonstrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pyrolysis-Gas Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry (Py-GC/MS). Demonstrated accuracy for MP polymer type identification (ID)[39][40][41][42][43][44]. Can characterize the identity of sample contaminants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%